PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 18.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 32.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus Maximus IV Extreme (all builds) |
Memory | 6.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20110221 |
Uptime | 0.8 Days |
Run Date | Jul 08 '18 at 13:49 |
Run Duration | 177 Seconds |
Run User | ITA-User |
Background CPU | 45% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i7-2600K-$319
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
|
60.9%
Good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1418 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 398.36
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
18.7%
Very poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston SSDNow V+200 Series 120GB
50GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 502ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 84 80 86 85 88 MB/s
|
32.9%
Below average
|
|||
SanDisk SSD Plus 240GB-$30
52GB free
Firmware: Z32070RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 77 94 79 89 58 MB/s
|
34.7%
Below average
|
|||
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70
215GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 66 65 66 66 66 MB/s
|
44.9%
Average
|
|||
Samsung HD502IJ 500GB-$40
10GB free
Firmware: 1AA01112
SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 74 66 47 45 49 MB/s
|
37.2%
Below average
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 7200.10 320GB-$80
172GB free
Firmware: 3.AAK
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 70 70 70 71 71 MB/s
|
40.4%
Average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Corsair Vengeance Pro DDR3 1866 C9 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
|
39.4%
Below average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-2600KIntel $319Bench 71%, 147,533 samples | 155x |
Core i7-2700KIntel $82Bench 73%, 20,692 samples | 38x |
Core i7-3770KIntel $175Bench 72%, 165,979 samples | 32x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples | 22x |
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 19x |
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 19x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 60% - Good | Total price: $799 |