Performance Results


Gaming 51% Yacht	Desktop 78% Battleship	Workstation 40% Speed boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	67.3% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	74.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (90%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-7400-$110 234,266 User benchmarks, average bench 64% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	70.7% Very good	Memory 78.7 1-Core 100 2-Core 195 71% 125 Pts	4-Core 363 8-Core 361 49% 362 Pts	64-Core 372 23% 372 Pts
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 70.7% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% HP(103C 82FB) ≥ 4GB; geforce nvidia gtx 1070 6gb CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 388.73 Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - GPU OC Guide	67.3% Good	Lighting 83.2 Reflection 92.5 Parallax 77.1 68% 84.3 fps	MRender 81 Gravity 78.8 Splatting 82.4 66% 80.7 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 67.3% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7LN256HMJP-000H1 256GB 5,580 User benchmarks, average bench 99% 22GB free (System drive) Firmware: MAV01H3Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 260 84 68 69 68 63 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	74.9% Very good	Read 399 Write 372 Mixed 319 SusWrite 102 67% 298 MB/s	4K Read 24.2 4K Write 64.1 4K Mixed 36.2 117% 41.5 MB/s	DQ Read 380 DQ Write 343 DQ Mixed 353 267% 359 MB/s
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 74.9% Great: 122%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 921GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 182 183 184 184 183 184 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	109% Outstanding	Read 198 Write 176 Mixed 90.5 SusWrite 183 118% 162 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 1.1 221% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 109% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 8ATF1G64AZ-2G3B1 2x8GB 7,552 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (13^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	63.5% Good	MC Read 18 MC Write 28.2 MC Mixed 22.4 65% 22.9 GB/s	SC Read 13.8 SC Write 19.4 SC Mixed 19.3 50% 17.5 GB/s	Latency 82.9 48% 82.9 ns
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 63.5% Great: 84%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16