Asrock X370 Gaming-ITX/ac

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding SSD, HDD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including moderate gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.1%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics114% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
MotherboardAsrock X370 Gaming-ITX/ac  (all builds)
Memory1.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180212
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 02 '18 at 23:32
Run Duration67 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G-$159
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
58.1% Above average
SC Int 67.8
SC Float 75
SC Mixed 72
57% 71.6 Pts
QC Int 283
QC Float 307
QC Mixed 284
66% 291 Pts
MC Int 571
MC Float 616
MC Mixed 601
89% 596 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 58.1%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$469
Gigabyte(1458 3774) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2025 MHz, MLim: 2546 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
114% Outstanding
Lighting 262
Reflection 316
Parallax 401
97% 326 fps
MRender 238
Gravity 384
Splatting 250
127% 291 fps
Poor: 66%
This bench: 114%
Great: 140%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$160
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
89% Excellent
MC Read 35.5
MC Write 35.4
MC Mixed 32.7
99% 34.5 GB/s
SC Read 13
SC Write 22.5
SC Mixed 15.1
48% 16.9 GB/s
Latency 94.9
42% 94.9 ns
Poor: 56%
This bench: 89%
Great: 108%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical X370 Gaming-ITX/ac Builds (Compare 596 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 108%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 102%
UFO

Motherboard: Asrock X370 Gaming-ITX/ac

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 109% - Outstanding Total price: $931
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $360Nvidia GTX 1070 $344Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $86
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $150Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $260Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $110
Intel Core i7-7700K $329AMD RX 480 $280Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $135
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $158SanDisk Extreme 64GB $80
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $899SanDisk Extreme 32GB $30
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $33Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $160SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $11
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback