| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 1.66% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 44.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asus P8B75-M (all builds) |
| Memory | 3.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20120803 |
| Uptime | 0.1 Days |
| Run Date | Jun 30 '18 at 14:24 |
| Run Duration | 128 Seconds |
| Run User | SGP-User |
| Background CPU | 18% |
PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
71.3%
Very good
|
64% 107 Pts
|
46% 346 Pts
|
21% 346 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Intel HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)
Asus(1043 84CA) 2.2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4252
|
1.66%
Terrible
|
1% 1.57 fps
|
2% 2.73 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Crucial M4 128GB-$116
70GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0309
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 95 106 106 107 129 MB/s
|
44.9%
Average
|
48% 215 MB/s
|
73% 26.9 MB/s
|
27% 48.3 MB/s
|
|
Hitachi HDS721010DLE630 1TB-$150
931GB free
Firmware: MS2OA610
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 122 113 119 114 130 MB/s
|
38.1%
Below average
|
59% 82.2 MB/s
|
90% 0.87 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
38.3%
Below average
|
37% 13 GB/s
|
30% 10.4 GB/s
|
54% 74.8 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical P8B75-M Builds (Compare 1,496 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus P8B75-M - $470
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples | 387x |
| Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples | 205x |
| Core i5-3570IntelBench 65%, 104,858 samples | 131x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 103x |
| HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples | 97x |
| GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 87x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 67% - Good | Total price: $906 |