Asus P5QL PRO

Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 35% Jet ski	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	4.08% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	24.6% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Motherboard	Asus P5QL PRO (all builds)
Memory	1.3 GB free of 6 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display	1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20090701
Uptime	1 Days
Run Date	Jun 17 '18 at 16:52
Run Duration	622 Seconds
Run User	LVA-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Quad Q9550-$161 34,093 User benchmarks, average bench 49% LGA775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.85 GHz Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	36.9% Below average	Memory 47 1-Core 34.1 2-Core 72.2 32% 51.1 Pts	4-Core 156 8-Core 158 21% 157 Pts	64-Core 151 9% 151 Pts
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 36.9% Great: 57%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 440 14,286 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Device(0000 0000) 512MB CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 800 MHz, Ram: 512MB, Driver: 368.69 Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	4.08% Terrible	Lighting 5.07 Reflection 5.92 Parallax 4.34 4% 5.11 fps	MRender 7.33 Gravity 4.4 Splatting 3.52 4% 5.09 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.08% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SanDisk SSD Plus 240GB-$28 133,640 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 34GB free Firmware: Z331 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (22^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 0 100 904 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 346 (A5) Unknown 100 100 85911273618 (A6) Unknown 100 100 1 (A7) Unknown 100 100 0 (A8) Unknown 100 100 9 (A9) Unknown 100 100 0 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 3 (AE) Unknown 100 100 194 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 52 46 231928234032 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 4013 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 206161707058 (E8) Unknown 100 100 100 (E9) Unknown 100 100 842 (EA) Unknown 100 100 1358 (F1) Unknown 253 253 989 (F2) Unknown 253 253 1125 (F4) Unknown 0 100 0	45% Average	Read 236 Write 184 Mixed 190 45% 203 MB/s	4K Read 21 4K Write 46.9 4K Mixed 4.78 63% 24.2 MB/s	DQ Read 155 DQ Write 158 DQ Mixed 12.9 49% 109 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 45% Great: 86%
Apple TS256C 251GB 638 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 9GB free (System drive) Firmware: CJAA Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 99 99 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 17713 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 3618 (A7) Unknown 100 100 0 (A8) Unknown 100 100 135738 (A9) Unknown 100 100 2212125150191 (AA) Unknown 100 100 257714552914 (AB) Unknown 100 100 515 (AD) Unknown 182 182 4330684867 (AF) Unknown 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 475 (C2) HDA temperature 61 40 257699217447 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 135738 (F0) Head flying hours 100 100 0	24.6% Poor	Read 165 Write 68.1 Mixed 107 25% 114 MB/s	4K Read 13.5 4K Write 23.7 4K Mixed 8.53 44% 15.2 MB/s	DQ Read 12.6 DQ Write 24.4 DQ Mixed 10.2 10% 15.7 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 24.6% Great: 50%
Samsung Spinpoint F1 1TB-$100 65,786 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 125GB free Firmware: 1AA0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 87 0 (03) Spinup time 77 77 7810 (04) Start/Stop count 93 93 7436 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 93 93 36430 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 93 93 6628 (0D) Soft read error rate 100 87 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 1 (B8) Unknown 1 1 128 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 4663 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 70 45 522059806 (C2) HDA temperature 68 44 73553215520 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 400187 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 22 (C8) Write error rate 99 99 4047 (C9) Soft read error rate 253 253 0	49.7% Average	Read 66.2 Write 107 Mixed 43 53% 72 MB/s	4K Read 0.42 4K Write 2.19 4K Mixed 0.38 101% 1 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 49.7% Great: 62%
Hitachi HDS722020ALA330 2TB-$53 17,356 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 56GB free Firmware: JKAO Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 134 134 97 (03) Spinup time 113 113 51581813372 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 894 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 121 121 35 (09) Power-on hours count 94 94 48644 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 825 (C0) Power-off retract count 98 98 2726 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 98 98 2726 (C2) HDA temperature 150 150 283468955688 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 16	38.6% Below average	Read 66.9 Write 67.3 Mixed 7.18 34% 47.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.71 4K Write 1.26 4K Mixed 0.41 99% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 38.6% Great: 69%
Hitachi HDS5C3020ALA632 2TB-$270 9,828 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 42GB free Firmware: ML6O Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 133 133 104 (03) Spinup time 169 169 34384576782 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 303 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 146 146 29 (09) Power-on hours count 96 96 31374 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 289 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 477 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 477 (C2) HDA temperature 171 171 201864445987 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	33.6% Below average	Read 57.8 Write 59.2 Mixed 11.6 31% 42.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 1.33 4K Mixed 0.31 72% 0.65 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 33.6% Great: 73%
Hitachi HDS721010CLA332 1TB 114 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 166GB free, PID 1004 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	9.12% Terrible	Read 31.4 Write 1.34 Mixed 6.43 11% 13.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.68 4K Write 1.34 4K Mixed 0.4 62% 0.81 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 9.12% Great: 19%
WDC WD25 00JB-00REA0 250GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 60GB free, PID 2506 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	15.8% Very poor	Read 30.6 Write 27.5 Mixed 11.7 28% 23.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.43 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.44 74% 0.85 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 15.8% Great: 20%
WD i HDS72 External 2TB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 50GB free, PID null Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	14.8% Very poor	Read 31.5 Write 28.6 Mixed 14.6 30% 24.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.67 4K Write 1.25 4K Mixed 0.28 55% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 14.8% Great: 15%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 6GB 111,301 User benchmarks, average bench 25% null MHz 2048, 2048, 1024, 1024 MB Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	15.3% Very poor	MC Read 5 MC Write 6 MC Mixed 5.3 16% 5.43 GB/s	SC Read 2.1 SC Write 1.8 SC Mixed 4.2 8% 2.7 GB/s	Latency 172 23% 172 ns
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 15.3% Great: 46%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P5QL PRO Builds (Compare 262 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 10%

Tree trunk

Desktop 52%

Yacht

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P5QL PRO

CPU
Core2 Duo E8400Intel $89Bench 40%, 68,540 samples	43x
Core2 Quad Q8400Intel $150Bench 45%, 18,432 samples	28x
Core2 Quad Q9550Intel $161Bench 49%, 34,093 samples	20x

GPU
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	13x
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples	13x
GeForce GT 610NvidiaBench 2%, 62,458 samples	12x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	9x
A400 120GBKingston $29Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	7x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	6x

RAM
4x2GBUnknownBench 25%, 183,252 samples	132x
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	44x
6GBUnknownBench 25%, 111,301 samples	23x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 46% - Average

Total price: $209

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16