| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 17.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (43%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
| System | HP HPE-372f (all builds) |
| Motherboard | MSI 2A9C |
| Memory | 0.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20100519 |
| Uptime | 1.6 Days |
| Run Date | Jun 14 '18 at 23:12 |
| Run Duration | 121 Seconds |
| Run User | CAN-User |
| Background CPU | 43% |
PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
64.4%
Good
|
58% 89.1 Pts
|
32% 262 Pts
|
15% 247 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 660-$170
EVGA(3842 3063) 2GB
CLim: 1293 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.24
|
17.4%
Very poor
|
16% 21.5 fps
|
19% 24.1 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
41.8%
Average
|
56% 73.7 MB/s
|
39% 0.41 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CE80CE80 M378B5673FH0-CH9 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
37.4%
Below average
|
36% 12.4 GB/s
|
26% 9.03 GB/s
|
68% 58.8 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical HPE-372f Builds (Compare 20 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: HP HPE-372f
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 5770AMDBench 10%, 37,602 samples | 5x |
| GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples | 3x |
| GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples | 2x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 61% - Good | Total price: $339 |