Asus TUF X299 MARK 1

Performance Results


Gaming 78% Battleship	Desktop 86% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 74% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	90.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	186% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus TUF X299 MARK 1 (all builds)
Memory	9.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180307
Uptime	4.8 Days
Run Date	Jun 08 '18 at 17:03
Run Duration	251 Seconds
Run User	NLD-User
Background CPU	10%

Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7800X-$216 22,334 User benchmarks, average bench 78% LGA 2066 R4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	80.6% Excellent	Memory 81.8 1-Core 110 2-Core 219 77% 137 Pts	4-Core 427 8-Core 719 70% 573 Pts	64-Core 1,039 64% 1,039 Pts
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 80.6% Great: 87%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400 1,082,454 User benchmarks, average bench 102% EVGA(3842 6183) CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 397.31 Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	90.8% Outstanding	Lighting 109 Reflection 145 Parallax 124 89% 126 fps	MRender 113 Gravity 129 Splatting 108 95% 117 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 90.8% Great: 110%
Nvidia GT 1030 185,384 User benchmarks, average bench 14% EVGA(3842 6333) 2GB; 02G-P4-6333-KR, Evga gt1030 CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 397.31 Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	15.2% Very poor	Lighting 18.9 Reflection 14.6 Parallax 17.6 15% 17 fps	MRender 14.5 Gravity 18.6 Splatting 20.2 15% 17.8 fps
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 15.2% Great: 15%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SanDisk Ultra II 960GB-$226 35,454 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 808GB free Firmware: X41200RL Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 3013 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 563 (A5) Unknown 100 100 9764984 (A6) Unknown 100 100 1 (A7) Unknown 100 100 34 (A8) Unknown 100 100 7 (A9) Unknown 100 100 811 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 1 (AE) Unknown 100 100 61 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 74 62 266288562202 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 146029805602 (E8) Unknown 100 100 100 (E9) Unknown 100 100 1980 (EA) Unknown 100 100 2476 (F1) Unknown 253 253 2323 (F2) Unknown 253 253 1474 (F4) Unknown 0 100 0	70.3% Very good	Read 489 Write 340 Mixed 332 86% 387 MB/s	4K Read 21.3 4K Write 26.1 4K Mixed 15.6 66% 21 MB/s	DQ Read 280 DQ Write 171 DQ Mixed 43.8 82% 165 MB/s
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 70.3% Great: 107%
Corsair Force MP500 NVMe PCIe M.2 480GB-$194 3,881 User benchmarks, average bench 158% 179GB free (System drive) Firmware: E7FM02.1 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	186% Outstanding	Read 1,780 Write 1,283 Mixed 1,464 335% 1,509 MB/s	4K Read 19.6 4K Write 37.9 4K Mixed 19.6 75% 25.7 MB/s	DQ Read 300 DQ Write 295 DQ Mixed 87.5 124% 228 MB/s
Poor: 105% ↑ This bench: 186% Great: 211%
Sandisk PLUS 480G 480GB 175 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 97GB free Firmware: Z32060RL Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (69^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 0 100 3307 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 723 (A5) Unknown 100 100 1374413128035 (A6) Unknown 100 100 2 (A7) Unknown 100 100 0 (A8) Unknown 100 100 10 (A9) Unknown 100 100 0 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 6 (AE) Unknown 100 100 78 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 61 47 227633266727 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 506812170358 (E8) Unknown 100 100 100 (E9) Unknown 100 100 3052 (EA) Unknown 100 100 6654 (F1) Unknown 253 253 3481 (F2) Unknown 253 253 2604 (F4) Unknown 0 100 0	61.8% Good	Read 499 Write 384 Mixed 284 86% 389 MB/s	4K Read 16 4K Write 36.1 4K Mixed 2.01 46% 18 MB/s	DQ Read 16.7 DQ Write 254 DQ Mixed 5.86 43% 92.1 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 61.8% Great: 75%
Sandisk PLUS 480G 480GB 175 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 76GB free Firmware: Z32060RL Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (67^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 0 100 2993 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 661 (A5) Unknown 100 100 330747740300 (A6) Unknown 100 100 1 (A7) Unknown 100 100 0 (A8) Unknown 100 100 3 (A9) Unknown 100 100 0 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 2 (AE) Unknown 100 100 73 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 58 44 240518168618 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 197570658350 (E8) Unknown 100 100 100 (E9) Unknown 100 100 1099 (EA) Unknown 100 100 2503 (F1) Unknown 253 253 1460 (F2) Unknown 253 253 880 (F4) Unknown 0 100 0	60.8% Good	Read 497 Write 335 Mixed 362 88% 398 MB/s	4K Read 15.5 4K Write 37.2 4K Mixed 0.04 43% 17.6 MB/s	DQ Read 151 DQ Write 255 DQ Mixed 2.37 58% 136 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 60.8% Great: 75%
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$210 68,849 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 50GB free Firmware: EXM02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 5168 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 976 (B1) Unknown 99 99 27 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 70 60 30 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 71 (F1) Unknown 99 99 15632000095	71.9% Very good	Read 514 Write 213 Mixed 391 82% 372 MB/s	4K Read 20.6 4K Write 36.7 4K Mixed 26.6 85% 27.9 MB/s	DQ Read 285 DQ Write 246 DQ Mixed 14.9 80% 182 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 71.9% Great: 124%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$35 496,077 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 381GB free Firmware: 15.01H15 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 142 141 3858 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 2008 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 2055 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 313 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 34 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 1973 (C2) HDA temperature 111 103 32 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 3 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	66.4% Good	Read 116 Write 115 Mixed 114 87% 115 MB/s	4K Read 0.66 4K Write 1.91 4K Mixed 0.36 103% 0.98 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 66.4% Great: 69%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 2666 C15 4x4GB 11,950 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 4 of 8 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing below potential (37^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	86.2% Excellent	MC Read 23.6 MC Write 52.1 MC Mixed 25.4 96% 33.7 GB/s	SC Read 7.7 SC Write 21.9 SC Mixed 11 39% 13.5 GB/s	Latency 77.3 52% 77.3 ns
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 86.2% Great: 105%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF X299 MARK 1 Builds (Compare 693 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 103%

UFO

Desktop 89%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 104%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF X299 MARK 1

CPU
Core i7-7820XIntel $375Bench 80%, 28,524 samples	179x
Core i7-7800XIntel $216Bench 78%, 22,334 samples	133x
Core i9-7900XIntel $462Bench 82%, 19,432 samples	119x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	80x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	68x
RTX 3090Nvidia $1,306Bench 210%, 158,856 samples	39x

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	37x
960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsung $139Bench 266%, 63,520 samples	30x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 213%, 165,668 samples	26x

RAM
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $113Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	40x
Dominator DDR4 2800 C16 8x4GBCorsairBench 113%, 223 samples	19x
F4 DDR4 4000 C15 4x8GBG.SKILLBench 115%, 708 samples	17x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 74% - Very good

Total price: $1,131

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16