Dell XPS 8900

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 74%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 65%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics91.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive73.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemDell XPS 8900  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 0XJ8C4
Memory12.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170629
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateJun 07 '18 at 23:13
Run Duration242 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU8%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700-$180
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
78.1% Very good
Memory 82.4
1-Core 108
2-Core 221
77% 137 Pts
4-Core 398
8-Core 649
64% 524 Pts
64-Core 652
40% 652 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 78.1%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 397.64
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
91.1% Outstanding
Lighting 113
Reflection 122
Parallax 93.8
92% 109 fps
MRender 105
Gravity 126
Splatting 101
90% 111 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 91.1%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDBNCE0010PNC-WRSN 1TB
462GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X41110WD Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
73.5% Very good
Read 489
Write 335
Mixed 373
88% 399 MB/s
4K Read 24.6
4K Write 43.7
4K Mixed 19.9
86% 29.4 MB/s
DQ Read 182
DQ Write 160
DQ Mixed 11.2
52% 118 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 73.5%
Great: 107%
Intel 530 Series 240GB-$149
223GB free
Firmware: DC32 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
61.6% Good
Read 371
Write 186
Mixed 237
58% 265 MB/s
4K Read 28.5
4K Write 53.9
4K Mixed 20.1
98% 34.2 MB/s
DQ Read 177
DQ Write 113
DQ Mixed 12.6
45% 101 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 61.6%
Great: 91%
Intel 520 Series 180GB-$132
168GB free
Firmware: 400i Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
64.3% Good
Read 495
Write 206
Mixed 264
70% 321 MB/s
4K Read 29.4
4K Write 69.6
4K Mixed 12
97% 37 MB/s
DQ Read 26.8
DQ Write 168
DQ Mixed 12.8
35% 69.3 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 64.3%
Great: 88%
Jetdrive Transcend 251GB
103GB free
Firmware: 0
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
61% Good
Read 425
Write 329
Mixed 375
84% 376 MB/s
4K Read 14.9
4K Write 32.7
4K Mixed 17.5
62% 21.7 MB/s
DQ Read 141
DQ Write 66.9
DQ Mixed 58.6
56% 89 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 61%
Great: 65%
WD Gold 12TB (2017)-$280
4TB free
Firmware: 01.01H01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
99.6% Outstanding
Read 180
Write 166
Mixed 183
133% 176 MB/s
4K Read 0.77
4K Write 4.67
4K Mixed 0.49
172% 1.97 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 99.6%
Great: 138%
WD Black 4TB (2013)-$178
3.5TB free
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
97.7% Outstanding
Read 178
Write 162
Mixed 164
127% 168 MB/s
4K Read 0.97
4K Write 3.11
4K Mixed 0.2
120% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 97.7%
Great: 98%
Asmt 2105 4TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: 0
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
88.9% Excellent
Read 150
Write 159
Mixed 155
117% 155 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 3.06
4K Mixed 0.24
117% 1.36 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 88.9%
Great: 99%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS8G4D240FSB.16FBD2 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
80.4% Excellent
MC Read 28.5
MC Write 31.4
MC Mixed 26.8
83% 28.9 GB/s
SC Read 16.7
SC Write 30.4
SC Mixed 24.2
68% 23.8 GB/s
Latency 76.3
52% 76.3 ns
Poor: 70%
This bench: 80.4%
Great: 101%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical XPS 8900 Builds (Compare 2,772 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: Dell XPS 8900

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $370
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback