Asrock H310M-HDV

Performance Results


Gaming 73% Battleship	Desktop 82% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 57% Gunboat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	98.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	98.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (72%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock H310M-HDV (all builds)
Memory	12.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180213
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	May 30 '18 at 19:28
Run Duration	147 Seconds
Run User	NLD-User
Background CPU	72%

PC Performing as expected (49^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-8400-$131 312,220 User benchmarks, average bench 82% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	73.1% Very good	Memory 90.8 1-Core 106 2-Core 204 77% 134 Pts	4-Core 312 8-Core 378 44% 345 Pts	64-Core 355 22% 355 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 73.1% Great: 89%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-Ti-$299 412,133 User benchmarks, average bench 94% Gigabyte(1458 3795) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 397.93 Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	98.6% Outstanding	Lighting 127 Reflection 139 Parallax 119 104% 128 fps	MRender 96.9 Gravity 123 Splatting 104 88% 108 fps
Poor: 86% ↑ This bench: 98.6% Great: 101%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 433GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (36^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 2 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 6 (B1) Unknown 100 100 0 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 59 59 41 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 2 (F1) Unknown 99 99 134819408	98.4% Outstanding	Read 521 Write 412 Mixed 424 101% 452 MB/s	4K Read 35.1 4K Write 62.3 4K Mixed 36 132% 44.5 MB/s	DQ Read 318 DQ Write 210 DQ Mixed 107 122% 212 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 98.4% Great: 129%
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$37 339,020 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 89GB free Firmware: 583ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (53^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 95 95 3999475 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 92 92 86157043965585 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2151 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 176 (B1) Unknown 0 0 98 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 35 48 25772949539 (C2) HDA temperature 35 48 25772949539 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 3999475 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 3999475 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 3999475 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 95 95 30064771073 (E9) Unknown 0 0 12261 (EA) Unknown 0 0 8894 (F1) Unknown 0 0 8894 (F2) Unknown 0 0 18236	54.3% Above average	Read 414 Write 108 Mixed 155 49% 226 MB/s	4K Read 22.7 4K Write 74.5 4K Mixed 14.3 92% 37.2 MB/s	DQ Read 82.4 DQ Write 112 DQ Mixed 24.8 39% 73.1 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 54.3% Great: 73%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$65 103,919 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 915GB free Firmware: 01.00A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 199 171 (03) Spinup time 106 81 7683 (04) Start/Stop count 96 96 4577 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 85 85 11175 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 96 96 4511 (C0) Power-off retract count 199 199 1145 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 94 94 319424 (C2) HDA temperature 117 94 30 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 1	59.5% Above average	Read 99.2 Write 108 Mixed 95 76% 101 MB/s	4K Read 0.56 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.39 98% 0.88 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 59.5% Great: 57%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BLS8G4D26BFSBK.8FBD 2x8GB 5,007 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	58.7% Above average	MC Read 23.1 MC Write 19.9 MC Mixed 20.4 60% 21.1 GB/s	SC Read 10.9 SC Write 14 SC Mixed 16.4 39% 13.8 GB/s	Latency 66.1 61% 66.1 ns
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 58.7% Great: 96%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H310M-HDV Builds (Compare 1,218 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 28%

Raft

Desktop 80%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 23%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock H310M-HDV - $60

CPU
Core i3-8100Intel $110Bench 71%, 81,392 samples	317x
Core i5-8400Intel $131Bench 82%, 312,220 samples	316x
Core i7-8700Intel $200Bench 87%, 349,567 samples	194x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	174x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	118x
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples	102x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	102x
A400 120GBKingston $32Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	39x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	37x

RAM
TEAMGROUP-UD4-2666 2x8GBUnknownBench 79%, 17,908 samples	46x
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	35x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	20x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 89% - Excellent

Total price: $257

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16