Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (6th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 94 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 33%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive	38.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (88%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Hp-pavilion KZ751AA-ABU s3514.uk (all builds)
Motherboard	FOXCONN Irvine
Memory	0.7 GB free of 2 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1400 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20090211
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 29 '18 at 21:57
Run Duration	73 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	88%

PC Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Duo E8600-$180 6,109 User benchmarks, average bench 44% Socket 775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 3.35 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	33% Below average	Memory 54.6 1-Core 30.2 2-Core 63.4 32% 49.4 Pts	4-Core 68.6 8-Core 64.9 9% 66.8 Pts	64-Core 69.9 4% 69.9 Pts
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 33% Great: 49%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 120GB-$80 69,224 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 61GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 471 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 226 (B1) Unknown 99 99 9 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 99 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 66 49 34 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 28 (F1) Unknown 99 99 2592225672	38.7% Below average	Read 190 Write 167 Mixed 163 39% 173 MB/s	4K Read 20.4 4K Write 23.7 4K Mixed 15.8 64% 20 MB/s	DQ Read 29.6 DQ Write 41.7 DQ Mixed 15.9 18% 29.1 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 38.7% Great: 115%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x1GB 68,489 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 2 of 2 slots used 2GB DIMM DDR2 Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	8.17% Terrible	MC Read 2.2 MC Write 2.8 MC Mixed 2.4 7% 2.47 GB/s	SC Read 1 SC Write 1.3 SC Mixed 1.1 3% 1.13 GB/s	Latency 145 28% 145 ns
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 8.17% Great: 20%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16