Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results


Gaming 56% Gunboat	Desktop 86% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 53% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (84th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 16 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	63.5% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	76.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

Motherboard	Asus PRIME X370-PRO (all builds)
Memory	13.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1842 x 1026 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170330
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 24 '18 at 06:03
Run Duration	193 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	5%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 1600X-$125 140,440 User benchmarks, average bench 74% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	78.6% Very good	Memory 71.2 1-Core 120 2-Core 240 78% 144 Pts	4-Core 461 8-Core 768 75% 615 Pts	64-Core 981 61% 981 Pts
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 78.6% Great: 82%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% EVGA(3842 6264) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 397.64 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	63.5% Good	Lighting 80.5 Reflection 77.8 Parallax 68 66% 75.4 fps	MRender 70.6 Gravity 72.4 Splatting 73.7 59% 72.2 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 63.5% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Corsair Force MP500 NVMe PCIe M.2 240GB-$43 14,860 User benchmarks, average bench 151% 219GB free Firmware: E7FM05.0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	245% Outstanding	Read 2,425 Write 1,357 Mixed 1,657 400% 1,813 MB/s	4K Read 40.1 4K Write 96.5 4K Mixed 48.9 175% 61.9 MB/s	DQ Read 298 DQ Write 197 DQ Mixed 116 122% 204 MB/s
Poor: 106% ↑ This bench: 245% Great: 210%
SanDisk SSD Plus 240GB-$28 133,640 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 217GB free Firmware: Z22000RL Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (76^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 182 100 438 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 696 (A6) Unknown 100 100 1 (A7) Unknown 100 100 0 (A8) Unknown 100 100 9 (A9) Unknown 100 100 14 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 7 (AE) Unknown 100 100 229 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 67 100 171798691873 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 0 (E8) Unknown 100 100 100 (E9) Unknown 100 100 1363 (F1) Unknown 253 253 874 (F2) Unknown 253 253 544	73.9% Very good	Read 509 Write 368 Mixed 418 96% 432 MB/s	4K Read 25.7 4K Write 71.8 4K Mixed 4.36 82% 33.9 MB/s	DQ Read 209 DQ Write 171 DQ Mixed 26.5 64% 136 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 73.9% Great: 86%
Intel 535 Series 240GB-$200 9,142 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 112GB free (System drive) Firmware: RG20 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (39^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 6917 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 683 (AA) Unknown 87 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 100 100 174 (B7) Unknown 100 100 5 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 29 100 34362621981 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 174 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (E1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 974471 (E2) Load-in time 100 100 65535 (E3) Torque amplification count 100 100 28 (E4) Power-off retract count 100 100 65535 (E8) Unknown 87 100 0 (E9) Unknown 49 100 0 (F1) Unknown 100 100 974471 (F2) Unknown 100 100 375631 (F9) Unknown 100 100 184784	76.2% Very good	Read 493 Write 255 Mixed 312 78% 353 MB/s	4K Read 28.5 4K Write 66.5 4K Mixed 20.9 105% 38.6 MB/s	DQ Read 252 DQ Write 187 DQ Mixed 59 88% 166 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 76.2% Great: 95%
Hitachi HUA721010KLA330 1TB-$28 10,651 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 923GB free Firmware: GKAOAB0A Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 130 130 150 (03) Spinup time 106 106 55877829265 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 1041 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 132 132 33 (09) Power-on hours count 94 94 46985 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 394 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 1089 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 1089 (C2) HDA temperature 162 162 274878890021 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	47% Average	Read 79.9 Write 83.7 Mixed 82.6 62% 82.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.87 4K Write 1.75 4K Mixed 0.5 124% 1.04 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 47% Great: 46%
Hitachi HUA721010KLA330 1TB-$28 10,651 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 905GB free Firmware: GKAOAB0A Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 130 130 151 (03) Spinup time 111 111 55872520870 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 973 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 134 134 32 (09) Power-on hours count 94 94 47001 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 395 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 1060 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 1060 (C2) HDA temperature 162 162 279173791781 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	47.1% Average	Read 80.5 Write 83.2 Mixed 79.2 61% 81 MB/s	4K Read 0.84 4K Write 1.69 4K Mixed 0.51 123% 1.01 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 47.1% Great: 46%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX 2x8GB 8,261 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 1067 MHz Performing below potential (74^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	78.7% Very good	MC Read 30.4 MC Write 28.9 MC Mixed 27 82% 28.8 GB/s	SC Read 19.7 SC Write 28.5 SC Mixed 20.3 65% 22.8 GB/s	Latency 98.6 41% 98.6 ns
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 78.7% Great: 90%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PRIME X370-PRO Builds (Compare 2,523 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 74%

Battleship

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 72%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

CPU
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	416x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $225Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	326x
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples	204x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	214x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	194x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	188x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	94x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	89x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	75x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	160x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	122x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $37Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	57x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $847

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results

Run History

PC Performing above expectations (84th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

Feedback

PC Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)