| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 30.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 88.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (53%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
| Motherboard | Asus H110M-A (all builds) |
| Memory | 2 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20151116 |
| Uptime | 0.6 Days |
| Run Date | May 22 '18 at 08:26 |
| Run Duration | 111 Seconds |
| Run User | USA-User |
| Background CPU | 53% |
PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
65.5%
Good
|
59% 102 Pts
|
46% 347 Pts
|
22% 351 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
EVGA(3842 3963) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
30.6%
Below average
|
32% 36.7 fps
|
27% 33.7 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
88.7%
Excellent
|
96% 430 MB/s
|
119% 39.8 MB/s
|
96% 156 MB/s
|
|
|
81.1%
Excellent
|
100% 133 MB/s
|
68% 0.74 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Adata DDR4 2133 2OZ 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
59%
Above average
|
63% 22.2 GB/s
|
36% 12.5 GB/s
|
41% 98.6 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical H110M-A Builds (Compare 1,065 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus H110M-A - $76
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-6500Intel $67Bench 64%, 241,476 samples | 313x |
| Core i7-6700Intel $180Bench 72%, 282,363 samples | 179x |
| Core i5-6400Intel $79Bench 61%, 171,457 samples | 142x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 188,220 samples | 123x |
| GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples | 108x |
| GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 84x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 30% - Below average | Total price: $542 |