Asus PRIME X470-PRO

Performance Results


Gaming 15% Tree trunk	Desktop 74% Battleship	Workstation 14% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	6.96% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	51.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus PRIME X470-PRO (all builds)
Memory	12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1804 x 1014 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180413
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	May 12 '18 at 12:13
Run Duration	209 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	7%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$125 179,588 User benchmarks, average bench 73% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.85 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	76% Very good	Memory 81.6 1-Core 118 2-Core 233 80% 144 Pts	4-Core 378 8-Core 698 64% 538 Pts	64-Core 840 52% 840 Pts
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 76% Great: 81%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% MSI(1462 3301) CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 381.65 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	6.96% Terrible	Lighting 5.9 Reflection 9.5 Parallax 7.78 5% 7.73 fps	MRender 12.6 Gravity 13.3 Splatting 14.5 11% 13.5 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 6.96% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 61GB free Firmware: EMT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 3162 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 665 (B1) Unknown 97 97 44 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 99 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 68 57 32 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 204 (F1) Unknown 99 99 10500379945	41.1% Average	Read 501 Write 85.5 Mixed 143 52% 243 MB/s	4K Read 39.2 4K Write 0.33 4K Mixed 0.33 60% 13.3 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 41.1% Great: 124%
Samsung 830 128GB-$109 37,250 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 23GB free (System drive) Firmware: CXM03B1Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 93 93 31612 (0C) Power cycle count 95 95 4514 (B1) Unknown 83 83 591 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 64 60 36 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 253 253 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 1060 (F1) Unknown 99 99 66478717642	51.2% Above average	Read 483 Write 144 Mixed 246 63% 291 MB/s	4K Read 8.97 4K Write 47.3 4K Mixed 12.1 54% 22.8 MB/s	DQ Read 238 DQ Write 67.7 DQ Mixed 42.8 60% 116 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 51.2% Great: 76%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80 85,620 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 2.5TB free Firmware: MX6OABB0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 140 140 69 (03) Spinup time 133 133 34387919282 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 4483 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 124 124 33 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 24277 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 2963 (C0) Power-off retract count 96 96 4942 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 96 96 4942 (C2) HDA temperature 193 193 193273987103 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	113% Outstanding	Read 213 Write 181 Mixed 190 147% 195 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.07 4K Mixed 0.24 111% 1.14 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 113% Great: 107%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80 85,620 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 2TB free Firmware: MX6OABB0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (79^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 137 137 34387460508 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 2551 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 9082 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1232 (C0) Power-off retract count 98 98 2808 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 98 98 2808 (C2) HDA temperature 193 193 188979216415 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	101% Outstanding	Read 185 Write 166 Mixed 171 131% 174 MB/s	4K Read 0.78 4K Write 1.92 4K Mixed 0.24 95% 0.98 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 101% Great: 107%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80 85,620 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 1TB free Firmware: MX6OABB0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (79^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 139 139 72 (03) Spinup time 132 132 34388050353 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 2328 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 124 124 33 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 8467 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1104 (C0) Power-off retract count 98 98 2555 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 98 98 2555 (C2) HDA temperature 176 176 184684183586 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	101% Outstanding	Read 209 Write 142 Mixed 146 124% 166 MB/s	4K Read 0.67 4K Write 2.05 4K Mixed 0.2 88% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 101% Great: 107%
HitachiG ST 500GB 401 User benchmarks, average bench 22% 364GB free, PID 1014 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	33.1% Below average	Read 69.9 Write 86.6 Mixed 53.7 91% 70.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.31 4K Write 1.32 4K Mixed 0.19 52% 0.61 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 33.1% Great: 34%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 2x8GB-$42 131,007 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 2666 MHz clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	96.1% Outstanding	MC Read 37.9 MC Write 35.5 MC Mixed 31.1 100% 34.8 GB/s	SC Read 25.4 SC Write 33.4 SC Mixed 27.6 82% 28.8 GB/s	Latency 77.6 52% 77.6 ns
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 96.1% Great: 95%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PRIME X470-PRO Builds (Compare 5,551 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 83%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 85%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 81%

Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X470-PRO - $139

CPU
Ryzen 7 2700XAMD $210Bench 76%, 159,077 samples	1,947x
Ryzen 5 2600XAMD $120Bench 74%, 142,983 samples	435x
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $125Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	403x

GPU
RTX 2070Nvidia $200Bench 104%, 478,117 samples	285x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	283x
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	247x

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	284x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	226x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	213x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	278x
Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $55Bench 84%, 215,644 samples	231x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	222x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 107% - Outstanding

Total price: $635

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Asus PRIME X470-PRO

Performance Results

Run History

PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X470-PRO - $139

Feedback

PC Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)