Fujitsu CELSIUS R670-2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3.34% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive50.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory96GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 96GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemFujitsu CELSIUS R670-2  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU D2618-C1
Memory74.8 GB free of 96 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100726
Uptime3.3 Days
Run DateMay 07 '18 at 21:54
Run Duration247 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5650
CPU 1, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
71.3% Very good
Memory 91.8
1-Core 69.6
2-Core 144
63% 102 Pts
4-Core 275
8-Core 481
46% 378 Pts
64-Core 851
53% 851 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 71.3%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710
MSI(1462 8C93) 2GB
CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.71
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
3.34% Terrible
Lighting 3.77
Reflection 3.62
Parallax 3.53
3% 3.64 fps
MRender 3.81
Gravity 3.8
Splatting 5.96
4% 4.52 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.34%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intenso Sata III 128GB
14GB free (System drive)
Firmware: O1225L Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
50.2% Above average
Read 265
Write 153
Mixed 194
45% 204 MB/s
4K Read 15.9
4K Write 44.8
4K Mixed 24.7
80% 28.5 MB/s
DQ Read 130
DQ Write 106
DQ Mixed 57
59% 97.5 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 50.2%
Great: 91%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$27
930GB free
Firmware: CC43 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 184
Write 180
Mixed 150
128% 171 MB/s
4K Read 0.75
4K Write 1.66
4K Mixed 0.33
99% 0.91 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 104%
Great: 112%
WD WD1002FBYS-02A6B0 1TB
49GB free
Firmware: 03.00C09 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
54.2% Above average
Read 97.4
Write 91.1
Mixed 78.1
67% 88.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.64
4K Write 2.44
4K Mixed 0.53
131% 1.21 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 54.2%
Great: 62%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 64GB-$12
1GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
8.36% Terrible
Read 28.9
Write 12.2
Mixed 8.91
18% 16.7 MB/s
4K Read 6.31
4K Write 0.009
4K Mixed 0.01
24% 2.11 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 8.36%
Great: 30%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 12x8GB
12 of 12 slots used
96GB DIMM DDR2
Performing below potential (36th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
48.7% Average
MC Read 19.8
MC Write 15.8
MC Mixed 19.2
52% 18.3 GB/s
SC Read 6.2
SC Write 4.8
SC Mixed 7.1
17% 6.03 GB/s
Latency 64.4
62% 64.4 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 48.7%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical CELSIUS R670-2 Builds (Compare 72 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu CELSIUS R670-2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 9% - Terrible Total price: $440
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback