MSI X399 GAMING PRO CARBON AC (MS-7B09)

Performance Results


Gaming 85% Aircraft carrier	Desktop 85% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 85% Aircraft carrier


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	108% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	223% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	Micro-Star MS-7B09
Motherboard	MSI X399 GAMING PRO CARBON AC (MS-7B09) (all builds)
Memory	6.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20171218
Uptime	0.3 Days
Run Date	May 03 '18 at 12:28
Run Duration	152 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	25%

Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (45^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen TR 1900X-$110 7,071 User benchmarks, average bench 76% SP3r2, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	78.7% Very good	Memory 84.8 1-Core 107 2-Core 217 77% 136 Pts	4-Core 390 8-Core 739 67% 565 Pts	64-Core 1,220 76% 1,220 Pts
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 78.7% Great: 87%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400 1,082,454 User benchmarks, average bench 102% Asus(1043 85AA) CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 397.31 Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	108% Outstanding	Lighting 141 Reflection 152 Parallax 141 115% 145 fps	MRender 119 Gravity 137 Splatting 113 100% 123 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 108% Great: 110%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$249 18,356 User benchmarks, average bench 279% 462GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B6QCXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	223% Outstanding	Read 2,503 Write 1,697 Mixed 1,592 427% 1,931 MB/s	4K Read 13.7 4K Write 35.5 4K Mixed 4.46 45% 17.9 MB/s	DQ Read 149 DQ Write 159 DQ Mixed 105 93% 138 MB/s
Poor: 168% ↑ This bench: 223% Great: 363%
Corsair Voyager GT 3.0 16GB 75 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 8GB free, PID 1a01 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	13.3% Very poor	Read 42.2 Write 19.3 Mixed 27.8 34% 29.8 MB/s	4K Read 7.96 4K Write 0.34 4K Mixed 0.34 53% 2.88 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 13.3% Great: 18%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$39 287,720 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 2 of 8 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 3066 MHz clocked @ 1533 MHz Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	52.8% Above average	MC Read 18.4 MC Write 19 MC Mixed 16.7 52% 18 GB/s	SC Read 16.1 SC Write 18.3 SC Mixed 15.9 48% 16.8 GB/s	Latency 72.1 56% 72.1 ns
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 52.8% Great: 109%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X399 GAMING PRO CARBON AC (MS-7B09) Builds (Compare 262 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 99%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 85%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 120%

UFO

Motherboard: MSI X399 GAMING PRO CARBON AC (MS-7B09)

CPU
Ryzen TR 1950XAMD $225Bench 77%, 23,641 samples	123x
Ryzen TR 1920XAMD $800Bench 78%, 10,440 samples	43x
Ryzen TR 1900XAMD $110Bench 76%, 7,071 samples	37x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $499Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	38x
RTX 2080Nvidia $407Bench 124%, 316,424 samples	19x
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	15x

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	17x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	13x
960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $249Bench 279%, 18,356 samples	13x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 4x16GBCorsairBench 96%, 10,311 samples	12x
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $113Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	9x
TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 8x8GBUnknownBench 160%, 29 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 68% - Good

Total price: $767

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16