Asus P5KPL-AM

Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 59% Gunboat	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	17.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	30.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

Motherboard	Asus P5KPL-AM (all builds)
Memory	2.9 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colori
OS	Windows 8.1
BIOS Date	20100820
Uptime	1.3 Days
Run Date	Apr 30 '18 at 18:19
Run Duration	122 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Quad Q8200-$49 19,990 User benchmarks, average bench 43% Socket 775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.35 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	54.2% Above average	Memory 80.7 1-Core 40.8 2-Core 81.2 45% 67.6 Pts	4-Core 163 8-Core 163 22% 163 Pts	64-Core 164 10% 164 Pts
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 54.2% Great: 50%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 550-$79 79,894 User benchmarks, average bench 14% Sapphire(1DA2 E367) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1374 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 17.10.1 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	17.8% Very poor	Lighting 19 Reflection 35.5 Parallax 23.1 16% 25.9 fps	MRender 29.8 Gravity 16.1 Splatting 34 22% 26.6 fps
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 17.8% Great: 16%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk S128G 126GB 21,984 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 55GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3.1.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (13^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 1002 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 971 (A5) Unknown 100 100 74308 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 19 (AE) Unknown 100 100 556 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 69 31 201863987231 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 63 (E8) Unknown 100 100 0 (EA) Unknown 100 100 100 (F1) Unknown 100 100 3711164938 (F2) Unknown 100 100 4929613684	30.6% Below average	Read 233 Write 157 Mixed 187 43% 192 MB/s	4K Read 17 4K Write 14.2 4K Mixed 4.29 39% 11.9 MB/s	DQ Read 16.1 DQ Write 14.7 DQ Mixed 6.49 7% 12.4 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 30.6% Great: 56%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70 337,642 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 482GB free Firmware: CC34 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 108 92 20210043 (03) Spinup time 95 95 0 (04) Start/Stop count 95 95 5240 (05) Reallocated sector count 97 97 134 (07) Seek error rate 81 60 155307619 (09) Power-on hours count 96 96 3810 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 95 95 5263 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 1 1 397 (BC) Unknown 100 97 560 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 73 59 454688795 (C2) HDA temperature 27 41 47244640283 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 39 25 20210043 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 4 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 4 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 -80023830642433 (F1) Unknown 100 253 2228514266 (F2) Unknown 100 253 3318787406	58.5% Above average	Read 96.6 Write 107 Mixed 32.7 58% 78.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.33 4K Mixed 0.43 98% 0.79 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 58.5% Great: 68%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x2GB 446,702 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR2 Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	25.4% Poor	MC Read 8.2 MC Write 8.2 MC Mixed 7.6 23% 8 GB/s	SC Read 7.2 SC Write 8 SC Mixed 7.5 22% 7.57 GB/s	Latency 79.3 50% 79.3 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 25.4% Great: 44%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P5KPL-AM Builds (Compare 121 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 45%

Yacht

Workstation 3%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P5KPL-AM

CPU
Pentium E5200Intel $50Bench 36%, 13,848 samples	20x
Core2 Quad Q6600Intel $100Bench 42%, 59,658 samples	13x
Core2 Duo E8400Intel $89Bench 40%, 68,540 samples	10x

GPU
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	9x
GeForce 9500 GTNvidiaBench 2%, 27,834 samples	8x
GeForce 210NvidiaBench 1%, 98,254 samples	8x

SSD
BX500 240GBCrucial $29Bench 56%, 142,801 samples	4x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	4x
840 Evo 250GBSamsung $95Bench 96%, 217,115 samples	2x

RAM
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	96x
3GBUnknownBench 14%, 81,553 samples	14x
1x2GBUnknownBench 17%, 99,586 samples	9x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 43% - Average

Total price: $79

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16