Asus H87-PLUS

Performance Results


Gaming 37% Jet ski	Desktop 84% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 29% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	42% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	88.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus H87-PLUS (all builds)
Memory	25.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors, 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20130407
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 29 '18 at 09:50
Run Duration	218 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	13%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (50^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4670-$52 49,019 User benchmarks, average bench 66% SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	80.4% Excellent	Memory 88.4 1-Core 105 2-Core 220 78% 138 Pts	4-Core 419 8-Core 417 56% 418 Pts	64-Core 388 24% 388 Pts
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 80.4% Great: 77%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Zotac(19DA 1438) CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 397.31 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	42% Average	Lighting 47.5 Reflection 54.8 Parallax 44.4 39% 48.9 fps	MRender 67.9 Gravity 46.4 Splatting 61.8 48% 58.7 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 42% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 500GB-$150 68,337 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 35GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT0BB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 96 96 16394 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 906 (B1) Unknown 97 97 36 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 63 51 37 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 34 (F1) Unknown 99 99 36192289838	88.2% Excellent	Read 491 Write 340 Mixed 268 81% 366 MB/s	4K Read 35.1 4K Write 76.5 4K Mixed 24.7 125% 45.4 MB/s	DQ Read 282 DQ Write 200 DQ Mixed 84.3 105% 189 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 88.2% Great: 126%
Seagate Desktop SSHD 2TB-$75 94,145 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 1TB free Firmware: CC41 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (48^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 118 99 188424488 (03) Spinup time 96 95 0 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1301 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 65 60 3566053 (09) Power-on hours count 92 92 7373 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 733 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 99 65537 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 72 62 488046620 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 3 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 96 96 8206 (C2) HDA temperature 28 40 60129542172 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 56916906609869 (F1) Unknown 100 253 3196931882 (F2) Unknown 100 253 57681508694	84% Excellent	Read 126 Write 166 Mixed 117 102% 136 MB/s	4K Read 0.75 4K Write 5.28 4K Mixed 0.79 217% 2.27 MB/s
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 84% Great: 108%
Intenso Speed Line 16GB 241 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 15GB free, PID 0917 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)	8.04% Terrible	Read 22.5 Write 14.1 Mixed 7 16% 14.5 MB/s	4K Read 3.55 4K Write 0.28 4K Mixed 0.008 23% 1.28 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 8.04% Great: 25%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x8GB 1,123 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	53.1% Above average	MC Read 18.8 MC Write 18.8 MC Mixed 16.3 51% 18 GB/s	SC Read 14.9 SC Write 18.9 SC Mixed 18.4 50% 17.4 GB/s	Latency 69.1 58% 69.1 ns
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 53.1% Great: 73%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H87-PLUS Builds (Compare 847 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 66%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H87-PLUS - $128

CPU
Core i7-4770Intel $75Bench 70%, 176,321 samples	216x
Core i5-4570Intel $99Bench 62%, 129,272 samples	145x
Core i5-4670Intel $52Bench 66%, 49,019 samples	91x

GPU
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	94x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	55x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	42x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	49x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	35x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	26x

RAM
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	33x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	16x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBKingstonBench 56%, 28,461 samples	14x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $298

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $46

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16