Performance Results


Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 16% Surfboard	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	0.34% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	15.5% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (57^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Atom Z;735 SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.35 GHz, turbo 1.3 GHz (avg) Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	35.2% Below average	Memory 63.7 1-Core 11.6 2-Core 24.3 27% 33.2 Pts	4-Core 42.2 8-Core 43.3 6% 42.8 Pts	64-Core 45.5 3% 45.5 Pts

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail 0.667 - 0.854 GHz) 90,156 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Asus(1043 18CD) 1,024MB Driver: igdumdim32.dll Ver. 10.18.10.3643 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	0.34% Terrible	Lighting 0.33 Reflection 0.46 Parallax 0.41 0% 0.4 fps	MRender 0.71 Gravity 0.17 Splatting 0.78 0% 0.55 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.34% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk SDW32G 31GB 12GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0.1 Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	15.5% Very poor	Read 154 Write 69.1 Mixed 98.1 24% 107 MB/s	4K Read 5.78 4K Write 7.02 4K Mixed 3.53 17% 5.44 MB/s

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1x2GB 99,586 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 1 of 1 slots used 2GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	17.6% Very poor	MC Read 6.5 MC Write 6.4 MC Mixed 5.6 18% 6.17 GB/s	SC Read 0.4 SC Write 4.1 SC Mixed 2.5 7% 2.33 GB/s	Latency 117 34% 117 ns
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 17.6% Great: 26%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16