Asus MAXIMUS VI FORMULA

Performance Results


Gaming 114% UFO	Desktop 92% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 93% Nuclear submarine


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	131% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	90.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus MAXIMUS VI FORMULA (all builds)
Memory	27.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140815
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 27 '18 at 04:28
Run Duration	193 Seconds
Run User	DNK-User
Background CPU	26%

PC Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4790K-$348 455,746 User benchmarks, average bench 79% SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	86.2% Excellent	Memory 97.6 1-Core 127 2-Core 242 89% 156 Pts	4-Core 408 8-Core 560 61% 484 Pts	64-Core 607 38% 607 Pts
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 86.2% Great: 87%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% Asus(1043 85E4) CLim: 2025 MHz, MLim: 2775 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 397.31 Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	131% Outstanding	Lighting 183 Reflection 208 Parallax 183 149% 191 fps	MRender 132 Gravity 183 Splatting 128 119% 148 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 131% Great: 133%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 500GB-$150 68,337 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 267GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT0DB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 96 96 16359 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 2452 (B1) Unknown 85 85 171 (B3) Unknown 100 1 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 65 53 35 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 824 (F1) Unknown 99 99 211018674135	90.7% Outstanding	Read 499 Write 344 Mixed 350 88% 398 MB/s	4K Read 39.4 4K Write 72.2 4K Mixed 23.3 128% 45 MB/s	DQ Read 326 DQ Write 226 DQ Mixed 90 118% 214 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 90.7% Great: 126%
Intel 520 Series 240GB-$139 12,595 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 63GB free Firmware: 400i Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (66^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 0 0 -69286411500015 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 3892 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 100 100 2879 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 2879 (E1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 3025663 (E2) Load-in time 100 100 65535 (E3) Torque amplification count 100 100 20 (E4) Power-off retract count 100 100 65535 (E8) Unknown 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 98 98 0 (F1) Unknown 100 100 3025663 (F2) Unknown 100 100 770391 (F9) Unknown 100 100 61084	85.5% Excellent	Read 496 Write 239 Mixed 319 77% 351 MB/s	4K Read 34.1 4K Write 109 4K Mixed 21.6 137% 54.8 MB/s	DQ Read 266 DQ Write 242 DQ Mixed 80.8 108% 196 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 85.5% Great: 95%
Intel 520 Series 240GB-$139 12,595 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 37GB free Firmware: 400i Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (77^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 0 0 51831666250527 (0C) Power cycle count 96 96 4457 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 100 100 3304 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 3304 (E1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 3314970 (E2) Load-in time 100 100 65535 (E3) Torque amplification count 100 100 12 (E4) Power-off retract count 100 100 65535 (E8) Unknown 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 98 98 0 (F1) Unknown 100 100 3314970 (F2) Unknown 100 100 461964 (F9) Unknown 100 100 63282	88.3% Excellent	Read 498 Write 266 Mixed 326 80% 363 MB/s	4K Read 33.7 4K Write 110 4K Mixed 23.4 139% 55.6 MB/s	DQ Read 260 DQ Write 256 DQ Mixed 80.5 109% 199 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 88.3% Great: 95%
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95 217,115 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 33GB free Firmware: EXT0DB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 96 96 15621 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 2359 (B1) Unknown 91 91 102 (B3) Unknown 100 1 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 67 57 33 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 882 (F1) Unknown 99 99 52430485718	74.3% Very good	Read 501 Write 197 Mixed 247 69% 315 MB/s	4K Read 35.7 4K Write 68.3 4K Mixed 13 107% 39 MB/s	DQ Read 335 DQ Write 199 DQ Mixed 28.8 85% 188 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 74.3% Great: 118%
WD Black 6TB (2016)-$235 6,443 User benchmarks, average bench 98% 3.5TB free Firmware: 81.H0A81 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (55^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 138 138 100 (03) Spinup time 193 193 21496398176 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 360 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 128 128 18 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 2096 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 337 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 390 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 390 (C2) HDA temperature 166 166 180389937188 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	103% Outstanding	Read 186 Write 171 Mixed 177 134% 178 MB/s	4K Read 0.92 4K Write 3.11 4K Mixed 0.62 165% 1.55 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 103% Great: 121%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 2400 C11 4x8GB 5,910 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	84.5% Excellent	MC Read 31 MC Write 31.8 MC Mixed 26.5 85% 29.8 GB/s	SC Read 20 SC Write 23.7 SC Mixed 26.5 67% 23.4 GB/s	Latency 48 83% 48 ns
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 84.5% Great: 109%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical MAXIMUS VI FORMULA Builds (Compare 833 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 61%

Destroyer

Desktop 80%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 51%

Yacht

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS VI FORMULA - $400

CPU
Core i7-4770KIntel $120Bench 74%, 172,887 samples	494x
Core i7-4790KIntel $348Bench 79%, 455,746 samples	159x
Core i5-4670KIntel $62Bench 68%, 128,482 samples	49x

GPU
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	65x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	54x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	51x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	35x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	34x
870 EVO 1TBSamsung $89Bench 112%, 129,044 samples	26x

RAM
Vengeance Pro DDR3 2400 C11 2x8GBCorsairBench 58%, 40,596 samples	32x
TridentX DDR3 2400 C10 2x8GBG.SKILLBench 67%, 24,592 samples	28x
Vengeance Pro DDR3 1866 C9 2x8GBCorsairBench 55%, 18,444 samples	26x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 90% - Excellent

Total price: $761

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16