Asus GD30CI

Performance Results


Gaming 45% Speed boat	Desktop 83% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 35% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	53.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	59.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Asus GD30CI (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK GD30CI
Memory	13.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170413
Uptime	1.1 Days
Run Date	Apr 22 '18 at 17:42
Run Duration	218 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	11%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (44^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-7400-$110 234,266 User benchmarks, average bench 64% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	79.7% Very good	Memory 87.5 1-Core 108 2-Core 208 77% 135 Pts	4-Core 416 8-Core 419 56% 417 Pts	64-Core 418 26% 418 Pts
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 79.7% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% Asus(1043 871C) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 391.1 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	53.9% Above average	Lighting 63.6 Reflection 74.6 Parallax 60.9 52% 66.4 fps	MRender 84.3 Gravity 62.5 Splatting 67.3 58% 71.4 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 53.9% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
HFS256G39TND-N210A 256GB 39,780 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 94GB free (System drive) Firmware: 30200P10 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 166 166 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 253 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 393 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 57 (64) Unknown 100 100 2191506 (A8) Unknown 100 100 4 (A9) Unknown 92 92 95 (AB) Unknown 253 253 0 (AC) Unknown 253 253 0 (AE) Unknown 100 100 3 (AF) Unknown 253 253 0 (B0) Unknown 253 253 0 (B1) Unknown 97 97 33 (B2) Unknown 100 100 43 (B3) Unknown 100 100 314 (B4) Unknown 100 100 5126 (B8) Unknown 253 253 0 (BB) vendor-specific 253 253 0 (BC) Unknown 253 253 0 (C2) HDA temperature 49 0 64428179505 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 253 253 0 (C4) Reallocation count 253 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 253 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 253 253 0 (CC) Soft ECC correction 96 1 1551 (D4) Unknown 253 253 0 (EA) Unknown 100 100 9255 (F1) Unknown 100 100 1303 (F2) Unknown 100 100 1279 (FA) Read error retry rate 100 100 701358	59.4% Above average	Read 497 Write 256 Mixed 331 80% 361 MB/s	4K Read 21.5 4K Write 56.1 4K Mixed 10.6 76% 29.4 MB/s	DQ Read 23.4 DQ Write 68.1 DQ Mixed 10.7 18% 34 MB/s
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 59.4% Great: 83%
OCZ Agility 3 120GB-$102 38,562 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 8GB free Firmware: 2.15 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 120 120 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 1 (09) Power-on hours count 62 62 -96774203079948 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2104 (AB) Unknown 0 0 0 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 112 (B1) Unknown 0 0 11 (B5) Unknown 0 0 0 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 30 30 128850984990 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 0 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 1 (C9) Soft read error rate 100 100 0 (CC) Soft ECC correction 100 100 0 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 92 92 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 41502 (EA) Unknown 0 0 32235 (F1) Unknown 0 0 32235 (F2) Unknown 0 0 42788	31.4% Below average	Read 176 Write 87.2 Mixed 77.6 25% 114 MB/s	4K Read 16.3 4K Write 50.7 4K Mixed 7.46 61% 24.8 MB/s	DQ Read 13.7 DQ Write 59.3 DQ Mixed 34 27% 35.7 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 31.4% Great: 61%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$40 344,862 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 687GB free Firmware: MX4OABS0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (42^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 140 140 68 (03) Spinup time 175 175 25781272834 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 112 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 124 124 33 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 410 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 58 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 228 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 228 (C2) HDA temperature 130 130 210454446126 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	84.5% Excellent	Read 153 Write 141 Mixed 160 115% 152 MB/s	4K Read 0.67 4K Write 1.79 4K Mixed 0.21 85% 0.89 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 84.5% Great: 108%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$33 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 162GB free Firmware: CC4C Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 120 98 243537240 (03) Spinup time 97 97 0 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 2826 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 1112 (07) Seek error rate 85 60 4696920937 (09) Power-on hours count 62 62 33488 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2457 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 70 70 30 (BC) Unknown 100 99 1 (BD) vendor-specific 97 97 3 (BE) vendor-specific 58 48 722731050 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 641 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 1 1 491323 (C2) HDA temperature 42 52 42949673002 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 1 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 1 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 20173461414581 (F1) Unknown 100 253 -136893819299166 (F2) Unknown 100 253 37466671860652	72.9% Very good	Read 134 Write 120 Mixed 89 85% 114 MB/s	4K Read 0.68 4K Write 1.43 4K Mixed 0.29 88% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 72.9% Great: 112%
WD Elements 1TB 51,914 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 404GB free, PID 1021 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	17.6% Very poor	Read 36.4 Write 34.8 Mixed 21.5 38% 30.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.44 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.17 58% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 17.6% Great: 43%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378A2K43CB1-CRC 1x16GB 5,600 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 1 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	46.3% Average	MC Read 16.4 MC Write 16.3 MC Mixed 14 44% 15.6 GB/s	SC Read 13.1 SC Write 15.9 SC Mixed 14.5 41% 14.5 GB/s	Latency 70 57% 70 ns
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 46.3% Great: 47%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GD30CI Builds (Compare 588 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 64%

Destroyer

Desktop 82%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 54%

Yacht

System: Asus GD30CI

CPU
Core i7-7700Intel $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples	553x
Core i5-7400Intel $110Bench 64%, 234,266 samples	28x
Core i7-6700KIntel $180Bench 81%, 588,978 samples	2x

GPU
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	199x
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples	99x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	65x

SSD
HFS128G32TND-N210A 128GBBench 63%, 4,377 samples	86x
Micron_1100_MTFDDAK256TBN 256GBBench 78%, 6,868 samples	47x
SD8SBAT128G1002 128GBSandiskBench 58%, 3,654 samples	30x

RAM
M378A1K43CB2-CRC 2x8GBSamsungBench 74%, 24,860 samples	172x
M378A2K43CB1-CRC 1x16GBSamsungBench 42%, 5,600 samples	107x
HMA82GU6AFR8N-UH 1x16GBHynixBench 43%, 3,066 samples	32x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 112% - Outstanding

Total price: $299

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16