| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
| Graphics | 51.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Run History
| System | Gigabyte H110M-S2H |
| Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-H110M-S2H (all builds) |
| Memory | 3.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20161108 |
| Uptime | 0.3 Days |
| Run Date | Apr 21 '18 at 19:12 |
| Run Duration | 426 Seconds |
| Run User | GBR-User |
| Background CPU | 0% |
PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
53.5%
Above average
|
67% 116 Pts
|
29% 224 Pts
|
15% 241 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
Asus(1043 85CA) 3GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 391.24
Performing below potential (62nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
51.5%
Above average
|
49% 60.4 fps
|
56% 68.3 fps
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Crucial CT4G4DFS8213.C8FBR2 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
|
59.2%
Above average
|
63% 22 GB/s
|
39% 13.6 GB/s
|
41% 97.9 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical GA-H110M-S2H-CF Builds (Compare 4,299 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H110M-S2H - $198
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-7400Intel $110Bench 64%, 234,266 samples | 588x |
| Core i5-6500Intel $67Bench 64%, 241,476 samples | 459x |
| Core i5-6400Intel $79Bench 61%, 171,457 samples | 458x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 557x |
| GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 394x |
| HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 188,220 samples | 240x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 99% - Outstanding | Total price: $435 |