Asus PRIME H270-PRO

Performance Results


Gaming 19% Surfboard	Desktop 51% Yacht	Workstation 19% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	31.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	61.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (35%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus PRIME H270-PRO (all builds)
Memory	28.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colori
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20171214
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 11 '18 at 10:28
Run Duration	104 Seconds
Run User	ITA-User
Background CPU	35%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7700-$167 256,717 User benchmarks, average bench 76% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	42.1% Average	Memory 58.1 1-Core 27.1 2-Core 66.5 33% 50.6 Pts	4-Core 142 8-Core 371 29% 256 Pts	64-Core 625 39% 625 Pts
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 42.1% Great: 84%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Zotac(19DA 2454) CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 390.65 Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	31.4% Below average	Lighting 38.9 Reflection 31.9 Parallax 34.8 32% 35.2 fps	MRender 38.3 Gravity 38.1 Splatting 37 31% 37.8 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 31.4% Great: 33%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 1TB-$199 23,857 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 276GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 198 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 83 (B1) Unknown 99 99 1 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 63 49 37 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 2 (F1) Unknown 99 99 2969324986	61.7% Good	Read 492 Write 332 Mixed 356 87% 394 MB/s	4K Read 22.4 4K Write 19.3 4K Mixed 14.1 62% 18.6 MB/s	DQ Read 108 DQ Write 30.9 DQ Mixed 24 30% 54.2 MB/s
Poor: 78% ↑ This bench: 61.7% Great: 126%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905678-023.A00G 4x8GB 175 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	65.9% Good	MC Read 21.1 MC Write 26.5 MC Mixed 22.9 67% 23.5 GB/s	SC Read 17.2 SC Write 29.3 SC Mixed 21.1 64% 22.5 GB/s	Latency 133 30% 133 ns
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 65.9% Great: 95%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PRIME H270-PRO Builds (Compare 956 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 48%

Yacht

Desktop 83%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 41%

Speed boat

Motherboard: Asus PRIME H270-PRO

CPU
Core i7-7700Intel $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples	271x
Core i7-7700KIntel $242Bench 84%, 712,312 samples	158x
Core i5-7500Intel $89Bench 67%, 149,467 samples	124x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	150x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	98x
HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 153,031 samples	74x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	41x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	26x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	19x

RAM
HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GBKingstonBench 76%, 122,822 samples	50x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C14 2x8GBCorsair $42Bench 73%, 66,222 samples	39x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2133 C13 2x8GBCorsair $46Bench 69%, 47,721 samples	28x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 76% - Very good

Total price: $383

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16