Asus Z170 PRO GAMING

Performance Results


Gaming 34% Sail boat	Desktop 89% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 29% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	36.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	47.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus Z170 PRO GAMING (all builds)
Memory	11.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160620
Uptime	6.1 Days
Run Date	Apr 10 '18 at 14:36
Run Duration	308 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	10%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6700K-$180 588,978 User benchmarks, average bench 81% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	87.2% Excellent	Memory 92.4 1-Core 127 2-Core 252 88% 157 Pts	4-Core 442 8-Core 693 70% 568 Pts	64-Core 687 42% 687 Pts
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 87.2% Great: 90%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Asus(1043 85D1) CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 391.1 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	36.3% Below average	Lighting 47.3 Reflection 32.5 Parallax 38.9 38% 39.6 fps	MRender 38.5 Gravity 42.1 Splatting 37.5 32% 39.4 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 36.3% Great: 33%
Intel HD 530 (Desktop Skylake) 188,220 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Asus(1043 8694) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4835 Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	6.48% Terrible	Lighting 7 Reflection 9.85 Parallax 7.16 6% 8 fps	MRender 6.57 Gravity 6.2 Splatting 14.4 8% 9.07 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 6.48% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$37 339,020 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 1GB free (System drive) Firmware: 60AABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (34^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 95 95 17083889 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 92 92 -128213363712546 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 597 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 47 (B1) Unknown 0 0 3 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 27 36 68721836059 (C2) HDA temperature 27 36 68721836059 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 17083889 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 17083889 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 17083889 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 98 98 4294967296 (E9) Unknown 0 0 23148 (EA) Unknown 0 0 15634 (F1) Unknown 0 0 15634 (F2) Unknown 0 0 6264 (F4) Unknown 96 96 11993236	47.7% Average	Read 423 Write 106 Mixed 118 46% 216 MB/s	4K Read 18.7 4K Write 83.8 4K Mixed 4.71 79% 35.7 MB/s	DQ Read 27 DQ Write 87.1 DQ Mixed 27.8 30% 47.3 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 47.7% Great: 73%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$36 203,102 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 83GB free Firmware: CC46 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 119 99 226600052 (03) Spinup time 97 97 0 (04) Start/Stop count 96 96 4680 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 84 60 250903128 (09) Power-on hours count 80 80 18080 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1985 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 99 17180131336 (BD) vendor-specific 98 98 2 (BE) vendor-specific 69 51 521404447 (C2) HDA temperature 31 49 68719476767 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 35 22 226600052 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 19 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 44268227943530 (F1) Unknown 100 253 2576124195 (F2) Unknown 100 253 1704448599	42.5% Average	Read 79.3 Write 68.7 Mixed 83.8 59% 77.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.36 4K Write 1.48 4K Mixed 0.32 78% 0.72 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 42.5% Great: 70%
USB DISK 2.0 16GB 1,213 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 4GB free, PID 9917 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	9.52% Terrible	Read 27.3 Write 7.64 Mixed 10.1 16% 15 MB/s	4K Read 7.37 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 0.53 69% 2.87 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 9.52% Great: 10%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
HyperX Fury DDR4 2666 C15 2x8GB-$169 37,519 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing below potential (4^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	43.8% Average	MC Read 15.7 MC Write 14 MC Mixed 12.8 40% 14.2 GB/s	SC Read 13.7 SC Write 15.3 SC Mixed 15.9 43% 15 GB/s	Latency 63.2 63% 63.2 ns
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 43.8% Great: 97%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Z170 PRO GAMING Builds (Compare 13,896 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 69%

Battle cruiser

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 58%

Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus Z170 PRO GAMING - $295

CPU
Core i7-6700KIntel $180Bench 81%, 588,978 samples	6,618x
Core i5-6600KIntel $81Bench 72%, 342,244 samples	3,671x
Core i7-6700Intel $180Bench 72%, 282,363 samples	1,044x

GPU
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	2,165x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	1,381x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	1,247x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	884x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	786x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $129Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	320x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	806x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	565x
Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x8GBHyperX $125Bench 73%, 59,072 samples	559x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 95% - Outstanding

Total price: $750

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16