| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (13th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 87 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
| Graphics | 3.27% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 37.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
| Memory | 4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen. |
| Motherboard | Asrock A75M-HVS (all builds) |
| Memory | 2.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
| Display | 1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 8.1 |
| BIOS Date | 20121119 |
| Uptime | 0.1 Days |
| Run Date | Feb 27 '16 at 10:37 |
| Run Duration | 142 Seconds |
| Run User | PHL-User |
| Background CPU | 10% |
PC Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
40.9%
Average
|
39% 61.3 Pts
|
18% 143 Pts
|
11% 179 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD Radeon HD 6550D
ASRock(1849 9640) 256MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.982.0.0
|
3.27%
Terrible
|
3% 4.48 fps
|
3% 3.93 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
37.5%
Below average
|
50% 228 MB/s
|
47% 13.4 MB/s
|
8% 12.7 MB/s
|
|
|
28.7%
Poor
|
36% 28.6 MB/s
|
294% 4.44 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C9 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 533 MHz
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
26.2%
Poor
|
27% 9.5 GB/s
|
15% 5.17 GB/s
|
32% 126 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical A75M-HVS Builds (Compare 59 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock A75M-HVS - $238
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| A8-3850 APUAMD $80Bench 46%, 3,108 samples | 18x |
| Athlon II X4 641AMDBench 48%, 1,109 samples | 10x |
| Athlon II X4 651AMDBench 50%, 1,008 samples | 8x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| Radeon HD 6410DAMDBench 2%, 3,128 samples | 8x |
| HD 7750AMDBench 8%, 22,655 samples | 5x |
| GeForce GT 630NvidiaBench 4%, 60,212 samples | 5x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 39% - Below average | Total price: $407 |