Asus M5A99X EVO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 56%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics19.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive84.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (35%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus M5A99X EVO  (all builds)
Memory0.7 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20130410
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMar 28 '18 at 03:33
Run Duration213 Seconds
Run User TTO-User
Background CPU 35%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8120
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
56% Above average
Memory 78.3
1-Core 55.4
2-Core 102
50% 78.6 Pts
4-Core 183
8-Core 310
30% 246 Pts
64-Core 319
20% 319 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 56%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 7790
Asus(1043 045A) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 13.152.0.0
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
19.8% Very poor
Lighting 24.9
Reflection 28.3
Parallax 29.6
20% 27.6 fps
MRender 22.4
Gravity 24.5
Splatting 21.9
19% 22.9 fps
Poor: 19%
This bench: 19.8%
Great: 21%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ Vector 256GB-$240
185GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
84.2% Excellent
Read 493
Write 450
Mixed 478
106% 474 MB/s
4K Read 22.6
4K Write 49.9
4K Mixed 28.7
97% 33.7 MB/s
DQ Read 193
DQ Write 108
DQ Mixed 68.9
73% 123 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 84.2%
Great: 111%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$29
58GB free
Firmware: 01.03B01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
36.6% Below average
Read 71.5
Write 55.8
Mixed 44.4
43% 57.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.52
4K Write 1.39
4K Mixed 0.28
79% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 36.6%
Great: 69%
SAMSUNG HD502HJ 500GB
445GB free, PID 2329
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
20.1% Poor
Read 33.7
Write 30.9
Mixed 31.5
41% 32 MB/s
4K Read 0.54
4K Write 2.73
4K Mixed 0.51
112% 1.26 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 20.1%
Great: 24%
ST332041 8AS 320GB
284GB free, PID 2329
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
18.1% Very poor
Read 34.8
Write 32.5
Mixed 12.6
32% 26.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.65
4K Write 1.88
4K Mixed 0.5
84% 1.01 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 18.1%
Great: 21%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4GB
1600, 1600 MHz
2048, 2048 MB
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
46.2% Average
MC Read 20.7
MC Write 14.6
MC Mixed 16
49% 17.1 GB/s
SC Read 7.6
SC Write 7.9
SC Mixed 10.2
24% 8.57 GB/s
Latency 83.7
48% 83.7 ns
Poor: 11%
This bench: 46.2%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A99X EVO Builds (Compare 322 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus M5A99X EVO - $300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Very good Total price: $517
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback