Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results


Gaming 26% Raft	Desktop 80% Battleship	Workstation 26% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	23.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	49.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus PRIME X370-PRO (all builds)
Memory	5.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1600x1200x4294967296 szín
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180122
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 26 '18 at 17:40
Run Duration	170 Seconds
Run User	HUN-User
Background CPU	3%

PC Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X-$225 66,470 User benchmarks, average bench 71% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	77.4% Very good	Memory 74.9 1-Core 108 2-Core 214 74% 132 Pts	4-Core 428 8-Core 853 76% 641 Pts	64-Core 1,176 73% 1,176 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 77.4% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon RX 560-B 49,289 User benchmarks, average bench 20% Sapphire(1DA2 E348) 2GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 22.19.662.4 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	23.3% Poor	Lighting 28 Reflection 31.2 Parallax 35.7 23% 31.6 fps	MRender 29.2 Gravity 26.9 Splatting 32.1 24% 29.4 fps
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 23.3% Great: 22%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Blue SATA M.2 250GB-$89 7,519 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 165GB free (System drive) Firmware: X41110WD Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 250 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 173 (A5) Unknown 100 100 7536729 (A6) Unknown 100 100 1 (A7) Unknown 100 100 31 (A8) Unknown 100 100 2 (A9) Unknown 100 100 318 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 1 (AE) Unknown 100 100 34 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 64 51 219044642852 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 107375099929 (E8) Unknown 100 100 100 (E9) Unknown 100 100 268 (EA) Unknown 100 100 655 (F1) Unknown 253 253 579 (F2) Unknown 253 253 872 (F4) Unknown 0 100 0	49.6% Average	Read 380 Write 150 Mixed 235 56% 255 MB/s	4K Read 24 4K Write 43.4 4K Mixed 9.02 71% 25.5 MB/s	DQ Read 126 DQ Write 96.7 DQ Mixed 38.6 49% 87 MB/s
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 49.6% Great: 100%
HGST Travelstar 5K1000 2.5" 1TB 129,581 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 795GB free Firmware: JA0OA560 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 166 166 77309411329 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 292 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 66 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 139 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 33 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 1840 (C2) HDA temperature 250 250 176094707736 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 5 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 0	53.8% Above average	Read 92.5 Write 95 Mixed 90.9 70% 92.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.51 4K Write 1.45 4K Mixed 0.18 68% 0.71 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 53.8% Great: 57%
Samsung Spinpoint F3 2TB-$105 4,536 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 632GB free Firmware: 1AN10003 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 1945 (02) Throughput performance 252 252 0 (03) Spinup time 60 59 12173 (04) Start/Stop count 97 97 3703 (05) Reallocated sector count 252 252 0 (07) Seek error rate 252 252 0 (08) Seek timer performance 252 252 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 8483 (0A) Spinup retry count 252 252 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 252 252 0 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 3311 (BF) G-sense error rate 98 98 24020 (C0) Power-off retract count 252 252 0 (C2) HDA temperature 64 49 219044315161 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 0 (C4) Reallocation count 252 252 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 252 252 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 252 252 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 96 96 2426 (C8) Write error rate 100 100 741 (DF) Load/unload retry count 252 252 0 (E1) Load/Unload cycle count 97 97 36036	64.4% Good	Read 94.3 Write 130 Mixed 77.1 75% 101 MB/s	4K Read 0.46 4K Write 1.93 4K Mixed 0.46 106% 0.95 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 64.4% Great: 59%
WD Green 1.5TB (2010)-$170 41,439 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 321GB free Firmware: 51.0AB51 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing as expected (54^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 199 196 224 (03) Spinup time 253 166 2166 (04) Start/Stop count 93 93 7109 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 92 92 6212 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 96 96 4071 (C0) Power-off retract count 199 199 1035 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 178 178 67592 (C2) HDA temperature 126 105 24 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 3 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 196 15408 (C8) Write error rate 200 196 0	44.8% Average	Read 83.1 Write 72.9 Mixed 74.9 58% 77 MB/s	4K Read 0.38 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.18 56% 0.55 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 44.8% Great: 63%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x4GB 7,607 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1200 MHz Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	88.5% Excellent	MC Read 34.3 MC Write 33.2 MC Mixed 29.1 92% 32.2 GB/s	SC Read 22 SC Write 32.2 SC Mixed 25.3 76% 26.5 GB/s	Latency 90.6 44% 90.6 ns
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 88.5% Great: 113%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PRIME X370-PRO Builds (Compare 2,528 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 74%

Battleship

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 72%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

CPU
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	417x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $225Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	326x
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples	204x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	215x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	194x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	189x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	94x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	89x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	75x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	160x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	122x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	57x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $847

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results

Run History

PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

Feedback

PC Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)