PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (86th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 14 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master! |
Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good. |
Graphics | 33.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 223% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files. |
Memory | 24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asrock X370 Gaming K4 (all builds) |
Memory | 20.1 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.9 GHz |
Display | 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben, 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20180212 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Mar 20 '18 at 04:29 |
Run Duration | 133 Seconds |
Run User | DEU-User |
Background CPU | 0% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
86%
Excellent
|
||||
Graphics Cards | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400
CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 391.1
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
28%
Poor
|
|||
AMD R9 285-$189
CLim: 945 MHz, MLim: 1375 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 18.3.2
|
33.8%
Below average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
90GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
|
223%
Outstanding
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Crucial BLT8G4D30AETA.K16FE 3x8GB
3 of 4 slots used
24GB DIMM DDR4 2934 MHz clocked @ 1467 MHz
|
91.9%
Outstanding
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples | 43x |
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $225Bench 71%, 66,470 samples | 23x |
Ryzen 7 1800XAMD $60Bench 72%, 30,050 samples | 22x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples | 17x |
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $499Bench 124%, 840,268 samples | 16x |
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 16x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 78% - Very good | Total price: $716 |