PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 43.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 86.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen. |
Motherboard | Asus PRIME X370-PRO (all builds) |
Memory | 13.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 8.1 |
BIOS Date | 20170224 |
Uptime | 0.1 Days |
Run Date | Mar 16 '18 at 13:39 |
Run Duration | 119 Seconds |
Run User | KAZ-User |
Background CPU | 11% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
65.6%
Good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia Quadro K6000-$4,000
HP(103C 1036) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 11.2GB, Driver: 390.65
Performing below potential (48th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
43.1%
Average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
152GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT03B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
|
86.2%
Excellent
|
|||
64.3%
Good
|
||||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Crucial BLE8G4D3 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 1067 MHz
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
36.8%
Below average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples | 417x |
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $225Bench 71%, 66,470 samples | 326x |
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples | 204x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples | 215x |
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 194x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 189x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 64% - Good | Total price: $847 |