| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good. |
| Graphics | 27.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asus P7H55D-M EVO (all builds) |
| Memory | 6.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz |
| Display | 1360 x 768 - 32 Bit cores |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20100722 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Mar 03 '18 at 16:38 |
| Run Duration | 136 Seconds |
| Run User | BRA-User |
| Background CPU | 17% |
PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon X3440
LGA1156, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
|
82.1%
Excellent
|
76% 129 Pts
|
55% 428 Pts
|
30% 484 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
27.7%
Poor
|
28% 36 fps
|
28% 33.3 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
51.4%
Above average
|
65% 86.6 MB/s
|
65% 0.63 MB/s
| |
|
|
41.1%
Average
|
54% 71.3 MB/s
|
86% 0.75 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 8GB
1066, 1066, 1066 MHz
4096, 2048, 2048 MB
|
30.2%
Below average
|
24% 8.57 GB/s
|
31% 10.8 GB/s
|
77% 52 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical P7H55D-M EVO Builds (Compare 85 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus P7H55D-M EVO
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7 860Intel $339Bench 64%, 51,451 samples | 21x |
| Core i5-750Intel $72Bench 62%, 43,796 samples | 14x |
| Core i5 760Intel $100Bench 64%, 34,495 samples | 11x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 13x |
| GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples | 7x |
| GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples | 7x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 55% - Above average | Total price: $518 |