Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming 5

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive	94.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming 5 (all builds)
Memory	13.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20171207
Uptime	1.5 Days
Run Date	Feb 28 '18 at 15:32
Run Duration	235 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 1600-$110 392,253 User benchmarks, average bench 70% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.65 GHz Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	82% Excellent	Memory 82.1 1-Core 112 2-Core 224 78% 139 Pts	4-Core 440 8-Core 732 71% 586 Pts	64-Core 921 57% 921 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 82% Great: 78%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85 104,444 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 88GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (49^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 96 96 19597 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 471 (B1) Unknown 96 96 47 (B3) Unknown 100 1 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 69 48 31 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 99 99 1 (EB) Unknown 99 99 409 (F1) Unknown 99 99 19555100796	94.6% Outstanding	Read 503 Write 354 Mixed 344 89% 400 MB/s	4K Read 43.5 4K Write 73 4K Mixed 24.1 135% 46.8 MB/s	DQ Read 358 DQ Write 238 DQ Mixed 62.9 110% 220 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 94.6% Great: 108%
Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB-$35 176,713 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 42GB free Firmware: 541A Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 95 95 40692163 (05) Reallocated sector count 97 97 17 (09) Power-on hours count 71 71 39238821242032 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2856 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 398 (B1) Unknown 0 0 99 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 25 38 1009319804953 (C2) HDA temperature 25 38 1009319804953 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 40692163 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 17 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 40692163 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 40692163 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 94 94 21474836481 (E9) Unknown 0 0 31158 (EA) Unknown 0 0 3554 (F1) Unknown 0 0 3554 (F2) Unknown 0 0 10453	52.2% Above average	Read 160 Write 151 Mixed 116 32% 142 MB/s	4K Read 21.9 4K Write 96.2 4K Mixed 14.4 102% 44.2 MB/s	DQ Read 163 DQ Write 154 DQ Mixed 34.4 60% 117 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 52.2% Great: 85%
WD Red 2TB (2012)-$82 64,359 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 521GB free Firmware: 80.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 176 169 4175 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 496 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 43 43 42250 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 479 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 370 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 125 (C2) HDA temperature 119 105 28 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0	59.2% Above average	Read 110 Write 95.9 Mixed 98.6 76% 102 MB/s	4K Read 0.44 4K Write 1.74 4K Mixed 0.19 72% 0.79 MB/s
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 59.2% Great: 86%
Samsung HD103SI 1TB-$89 48,059 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 408GB free Firmware: 1AG0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing below expectations (38^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 83 83 6100 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1302 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 253 253 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 95 95 25206 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 341 (0D) Soft read error rate 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 82 66 370212882 (C2) HDA temperature 81 65 370212883 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 450897 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 253 253 0	44% Average	Read 66.1 Write 87.2 Mixed 72.4 57% 75.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.52 4K Write 1.42 4K Mixed 0.44 97% 0.79 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 44% Great: 59%
Samsung Spinpoint F1 1TB-$100 65,786 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 283GB free Firmware: 1AA0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing as expected (51^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 79 79 7260 (04) Start/Stop count 96 96 4158 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 253 253 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 88 88 60292 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 2 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 1670 (0D) Soft read error rate 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 76 49 471269400 (C2) HDA temperature 75 46 471269401 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 248305 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 1 (C8) Write error rate 100 97 85 (C9) Soft read error rate 253 253 0	47.1% Average	Read 78.8 Write 85 Mixed 88.8 64% 84.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.83 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.47 124% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 47.1% Great: 62%
Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB-$83 138,859 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 71GB free Firmware: 1AJ1 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 252 252 0 (03) Spinup time 72 67 8754 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 638 (05) Reallocated sector count 252 252 0 (07) Seek error rate 252 252 0 (08) Seek timer performance 252 252 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 49037 (0A) Spinup retry count 252 252 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 7 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 660 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 171 (C0) Power-off retract count 252 252 0 (C2) HDA temperature 64 55 193274380318 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 0 (C4) Reallocation count 252 252 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 252 252 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 252 252 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 100 14 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 7 (E1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 689	70.9% Very good	Read 115 Write 132 Mixed 113 90% 120 MB/s	4K Read 0.53 4K Write 1.92 4K Mixed 0.45 108% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 70.9% Great: 75%
Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB-$83 138,859 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 61GB free Firmware: 1AJ1 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 3 (02) Throughput performance 252 252 0 (03) Spinup time 72 70 8599 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 875 (05) Reallocated sector count 252 252 0 (07) Seek error rate 252 252 0 (08) Seek timer performance 252 252 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 53983 (0A) Spinup retry count 252 252 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 3 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 881 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 61 (C0) Power-off retract count 252 252 0 (C2) HDA temperature 64 55 197569347614 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 0 (C4) Reallocation count 252 252 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 252 252 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 252 252 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 17 (C8) Write error rate 100 100 3 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 3 (E1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 925	43.5% Average	Read 71.5 Write 79.7 Mixed 60.5 53% 70.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.71 4K Write 2.08 4K Mixed 0.5 123% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 43.5% Great: 75%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB 239,203 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3334 MHz Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	110% Outstanding	MC Read 45.1 MC Write 40 MC Mixed 35.5 115% 40.2 GB/s	SC Read 24.6 SC Write 42.1 SC Mixed 28.4 91% 31.7 GB/s	Latency 76.7 52% 76.7 ns
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 110% Great: 111%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-AX370-Gaming 5 Builds (Compare 678 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 90%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 80%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 87%

Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming 5 - $246

CPU
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	100x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $225Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	88x
Ryzen 7 1800XAMD $60Bench 72%, 30,050 samples	75x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	70x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	52x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	49x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $92Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	27x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	23x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	17x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	37x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	23x
Flare X DDR4 3200 C14 2x8GBG.SKILL $73Bench 98%, 54,616 samples	13x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 77% - Very good

Total price: $1,058

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming 5

Performance Results

PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming 5 - $246

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)