Asrock Z370 Taichi

Performance Results


Gaming 55% Gunboat	Desktop 98% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 52% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 99.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	50.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	122% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asrock Z370 Taichi (all builds)
Memory	12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit색
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20171130
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Feb 20 '18 at 04:14
Run Duration	217 Seconds
Run User	KOR-User
Background CPU	3%

Watch Gameplay: 480 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8700K-$186 746,287 User benchmarks, average bench 88% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	99.2% Outstanding	Memory 95.5 1-Core 139 2-Core 277 95% 170 Pts	4-Core 552 8-Core 921 90% 736 Pts	64-Core 1,247 77% 1,247 Pts
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 99.2% Great: 100%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 480-$75 261,163 User benchmarks, average bench 46% XFX(1682 9480) CLim: 1288 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 18.2.2 Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	50.6% Above average	Lighting 62.8 Reflection 56.9 Parallax 79.8 51% 66.5 fps	MRender 67.3 Gravity 62.2 Splatting 54.8 50% 61.4 fps
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 50.6% Great: 53%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$130 154,399 User benchmarks, average bench 110% 750GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (41^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 4177 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 77 (B1) Unknown 99 99 4 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 77 53 23 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 35 (F1) Unknown 99 99 8950092779	108% Outstanding	Read 510 Write 408 Mixed 414 99% 444 MB/s	4K Read 45.9 4K Write 98.3 4K Mixed 47.1 182% 63.8 MB/s	DQ Read 46.5 DQ Write 279 DQ Mixed 121 106% 149 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 108% Great: 133%
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$115 141,929 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 205GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXM04B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 816 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 181 (B1) Unknown 99 99 6 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 99 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 71 65 29 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 106 (F1) Unknown 99 99 2263761203	122% Outstanding	Read 511 Write 504 Mixed 506 113% 507 MB/s	4K Read 44.1 4K Write 116 4K Mixed 48.6 190% 69.5 MB/s	DQ Read 229 DQ Write 330 DQ Mixed 120 135% 226 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 122% Great: 124%
Revuahn_ M950X 120GB 112GB free Firmware: SAFM Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 12178 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 2157 (A8) Unknown 100 100 0 (AA) Unknown 100 100 280 (AD) Unknown 100 100 7078067 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 2021 (C2) HDA temperature 70 70 128850919454 (DA) Unknown 100 100 0 (E7) Temperature 100 100 97 (F1) Unknown 100 100 10956	86.9% Excellent	Read 490 Write 330 Mixed 396 90% 406 MB/s	4K Read 33.3 4K Write 83.1 4K Mixed 15.5 114% 43.9 MB/s	DQ Read 320 DQ Write 331 DQ Mixed 15.6 97% 222 MB/s

Revuahn_ M950X 120GB 100GB free Firmware: SAFM Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 6865 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 2005 (A8) Unknown 100 100 0 (AA) Unknown 100 100 335 (AD) Unknown 100 100 4259991 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 1864 (C2) HDA temperature 70 70 128850919454 (DA) Unknown 100 100 0 (E7) Temperature 100 100 98 (F1) Unknown 100 100 6407	87.3% Excellent	Read 491 Write 340 Mixed 403 91% 411 MB/s	4K Read 33.5 4K Write 83.5 4K Mixed 15.7 115% 44.3 MB/s	DQ Read 290 DQ Write 337 DQ Mixed 15.6 94% 214 MB/s

Samsung 750 EVO 120GB-$35 20,420 User benchmarks, average bench 93% 86GB free Firmware: MAT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 4715 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 845 (B1) Unknown 98 98 9 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 99 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 72 50 28 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 733 (F1) Unknown 99 99 2720912875	78.6% Very good	Read 493 Write 272 Mixed 278 77% 348 MB/s	4K Read 39.3 4K Write 62.7 4K Mixed 25.6 126% 42.5 MB/s	DQ Read 41.2 DQ Write 182 DQ Mixed 59.1 61% 94 MB/s
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 78.6% Great: 110%
OCZ Vertex 3 120GB-$42 25,948 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 47GB free Firmware: 2.25 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (65^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 4345409 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 29 (09) Power-on hours count 70 70 25890062887109 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 159 (AB) Unknown 0 0 29 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 589 (B1) Unknown 0 0 2 (B5) Unknown 0 0 29 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 30 30 128850984990 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 4345409 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 29 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 4345409 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 4345409 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 16322 (EA) Unknown 0 0 15901 (F1) Unknown 0 0 15901 (F2) Unknown 0 0 20834	71.7% Very good	Read 475 Write 120 Mixed 217 59% 271 MB/s	4K Read 34.9 4K Write 106 4K Mixed 18.3 132% 53 MB/s	DQ Read 180 DQ Write 149 DQ Mixed 42.9 65% 124 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 71.7% Great: 82%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378A1K43CB2-CRC 2x8GB 24,860 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	79.4% Very good	MC Read 30.3 MC Write 30.3 MC Mixed 21.7 78% 27.4 GB/s	SC Read 19.4 SC Write 31 SC Mixed 26 73% 25.5 GB/s	Latency 55.5 72% 55.5 ns
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 79.4% Great: 88%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Z370 Taichi Builds (Compare 973 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 111%

UFO

Desktop 96%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 102%

UFO

Motherboard: Asrock Z370 Taichi - $330

CPU
Core i7-8700KIntel $186Bench 88%, 746,287 samples	617x
Core i5-8600KIntel $173Bench 91%, 264,837 samples	90x
Core i7-8086KIntel $399Bench 91%, 38,086 samples	80x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	145x
RTX 3080Nvidia $910Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	81x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	79x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	65x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	45x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 213%, 165,668 samples	44x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	38x
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $127Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	31x
Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $55Bench 84%, 215,644 samples	28x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 81% - Excellent

Total price: $1,139

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16