HP 510-p169ng

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 52% Yacht	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	7.59% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	HP 510-p169ng (all builds)
Motherboard	HP 822A
Memory	4.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170331
Uptime	5.3 Days
Run Date	Feb 18 '18 at 16:25
Run Duration	136 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	14%

PC Performing as expected (59^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A12-9800 APU (2016 M.BR) 4,241 User benchmarks, average bench 44% P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	53.2% Above average	Memory 65.3 1-Core 77.3 2-Core 144 56% 95.5 Pts	4-Core 239 8-Core 236 32% 238 Pts	64-Core 235 15% 235 Pts
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 53.2% Great: 54%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 Graphics 37,078 User benchmarks, average bench 6% HP(103C 822A) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 17.12.1 Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	7.59% Terrible	Lighting 9.73 Reflection 11.4 Parallax 15.1 8% 12.1 fps	MRender 4.62 Gravity 13.4 Splatting 7.43 7% 8.5 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 7.59% Great: 8%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$29 763,289 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 862GB free (System drive) Firmware: MS2OA800 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (61^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 96 0 (02) Throughput performance 142 100 70 (03) Spinup time 125 100 12896960695 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 562 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 115 100 34 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 609 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 562 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (B9) Unknown 100 100 65535 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 3 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 64 52 405012516 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 562 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 562 (C2) HDA temperature 166 127 206159675428 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	91.1% Outstanding	Read 152 Write 165 Mixed 144 116% 154 MB/s	4K Read 0.61 4K Write 1.93 4K Mixed 0.2 83% 0.91 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 91.1% Great: 107%
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 32GB-$8 33,725 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 23GB free, PID 5581 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)	23.5% Poor	Read 93.2 Write 28.1 Mixed 39.4 57% 53.6 MB/s	4K Read 5.43 4K Write 0.82 4K Mixed 0.6 69% 2.29 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 23.5% Great: 38%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378A1K43BB1-CPB 1x8GB 7,085 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 2132 MHz Performing below potential (8^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	28.1% Poor	MC Read 10.8 MC Write 9.4 MC Mixed 8.7 28% 9.63 GB/s	SC Read 7.2 SC Write 8.3 SC Mixed 7.9 22% 7.8 GB/s	Latency 113 35% 113 ns
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 28.1% Great: 41%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $185	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

HP 510-p169ng

Performance Results

PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (59^th percentile)