Gigabyte GA-X99-Ultra Gaming-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 17% Surfboard	Desktop 80% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 16% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	11.9% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	78.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (39%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

System	Gigabyte Default string
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-X99-Ultra Gaming-CF (all builds)
Memory	26.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20180111
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Feb 15 '18 at 07:48
Run Duration	203 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	39%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6900K-$120 6,755 User benchmarks, average bench 86% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	82.9% Excellent	Memory 88.2 1-Core 116 2-Core 225 81% 143 Pts	4-Core 418 8-Core 709 68% 564 Pts	64-Core 1,207 75% 1,207 Pts
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 82.9% Great: 98%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119 627,793 User benchmarks, average bench 52% Nvidia(10DE 11C2) 3GB CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2052 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 390.65 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	11.9% Very poor	Lighting 13.3 Reflection 15.4 Parallax 12.5 11% 13.7 fps	MRender 19.4 Gravity 13.6 Splatting 17.7 14% 16.9 fps
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 11.9% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85 104,444 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 29GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT0AB0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 11394 (0C) Power cycle count 95 95 4189 (B1) Unknown 75 75 299 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 55 46 45 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 1421 (F1) Unknown 99 99 49019740133	78.5% Very good	Read 496 Write 275 Mixed 198 71% 323 MB/s	4K Read 38.2 4K Write 62.5 4K Mixed 17.5 113% 39.4 MB/s	DQ Read 250 DQ Write 158 DQ Mixed 52.9 80% 154 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 78.5% Great: 108%
Seagate IronWolf 2TB (2016)-$105 8,291 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 481GB free Firmware: SC60 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 109 99 21071952 (03) Spinup time 98 95 0 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1409 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 70 60 11448579 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 1854 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 684 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 99 99 1 (BE) vendor-specific 62 54 639828006 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 330 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 1409 (C2) HDA temperature 38 46 51539607590 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	47.5% Average	Read 88.8 Write 76.8 Mixed 19.8 45% 61.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.51 4K Write 1.38 4K Mixed 0.19 68% 0.69 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 47.5% Great: 100%
Seagate IronWolf 2TB (2016)-$105 8,291 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 481GB free Firmware: SC60 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 116 99 113268464 (03) Spinup time 98 95 0 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1405 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 70 60 12204651 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 1856 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 684 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 1 1 2491 (BE) vendor-specific 62 55 639696934 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 330 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 1405 (C2) HDA temperature 38 45 55834574886 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	52.5% Above average	Read 106 Write 77.1 Mixed 18.5 49% 67.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.38 4K Mixed 0.2 65% 0.66 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 52.5% Great: 100%
Hitachi Deskstar 7K1000.C 1TB-$40 97,793 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 251GB free Firmware: JP4OA39C Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing as expected (46^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 85 85 10354755 (02) Throughput performance 135 135 97 (03) Spinup time 120 120 25790513468 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 8283 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 132 132 34 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 16220 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 3266 (C0) Power-off retract count 93 93 8634 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 93 93 8634 (C2) HDA temperature 150 150 223338954792 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 3 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	56.2% Above average	Read 106 Write 89.6 Mixed 61.5 64% 85.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.17 4K Mixed 0.39 86% 0.69 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 56.2% Great: 74%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GB 6,789 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 4 of 8 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (15^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	69.2% Good	MC Read 29 MC Write 24.6 MC Mixed 22.3 72% 25.3 GB/s	SC Read 12.7 SC Write 19.2 SC Mixed 17.7 47% 16.5 GB/s	Latency 69.3 58% 69.3 ns
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 69.2% Great: 125%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-X99-Ultra Gaming-CF Builds (Compare 358 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 88%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 89%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 79%

Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X99-Ultra Gaming-CF

CPU
Core i7-6800KIntel $78Bench 81%, 50,196 samples	138x
Core i7-6850KIntel $115Bench 84%, 29,279 samples	78x
Core i7-5820KIntel $130Bench 77%, 101,694 samples	45x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	53x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	48x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	26x

SSD
990 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $120Bench 421%, 18,218 samples	13x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	11x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 213%, 165,668 samples	9x

RAM
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 89%, 92,468 samples	14x
9965600-033.A00G 4x16GBUnknownBench 99%, 23 samples	9x
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $113Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	7x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 82% - Excellent

Total price: $598

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16