HP Compaq 8200 Elite CMT PC

Performance Results


Gaming 26% Raft	Desktop 77% Battleship	Workstation 21% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	31.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	64.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	HP Compaq 8200 Elite CMT PC (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 1494
Memory	20.7 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20120620
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Feb 14 '18 at 22:55
Run Duration	226 Seconds
Run User	ZAF-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing as expected (51^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2400-$250 166,255 User benchmarks, average bench 61% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	71.2% Very good	Memory 87.7 1-Core 85.1 2-Core 170 68% 114 Pts	4-Core 315 8-Core 330 43% 323 Pts	64-Core 330 20% 330 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 71.2% Great: 70%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10
Intel HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz) 150,891 User benchmarks, average bench 1% HP(103C 1494) 2GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	1% Terrible	Lighting 1.07 Reflection 1.42 Parallax 0.97 1% 1.15 fps	MRender 1.71 Gravity 0.77 Splatting 2 1% 1.49 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1% Great: 1%
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% MSI(1462 8C96) CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 390.77 Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	31.9% Below average	Lighting 40.1 Reflection 31.1 Parallax 37.5 33% 36.2 fps	MRender 37.8 Gravity 37.9 Splatting 36.3 30% 37.4 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 31.9% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$125 141,929 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 158GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXM04B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 885 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 77 (B1) Unknown 99 99 5 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 61 57 39 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 14 (F1) Unknown 99 99 1529726931	64.4% Good	Read 370 Write 331 Mixed 349 78% 350 MB/s	4K Read 25.3 4K Write 55.4 4K Mixed 19.2 92% 33.3 MB/s	DQ Read 29.5 DQ Write 54.5 DQ Mixed 19 21% 34.3 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 64.4% Great: 124%
Hitachi HDS721025CLA682 250GB 1,787 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 113GB free Firmware: JP1OA41A Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (57^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 94 0 (02) Throughput performance 134 100 101 (03) Spinup time 117 100 12897812675 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 1447 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 138 100 31 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 8310 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1196 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (B9) Unknown 100 100 65535 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 60 17184325912 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 66 43 421855266 (C0) Power-off retract count 99 99 1466 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 99 99 1466 (C2) HDA temperature 176 109 244813987874 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 114	56.8% Above average	Read 97.1 Write 101 Mixed 102 76% 100 MB/s	4K Read 0.46 4K Write 1.21 4K Mixed 0.35 81% 0.68 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 56.8% Great: 75%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70 337,642 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 45GB free Firmware: CC38 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing as expected (50^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 117 86 134243007 (03) Spinup time 95 94 0 (04) Start/Stop count 95 95 5909 (05) Reallocated sector count 72 72 1150 (07) Seek error rate 79 60 91198403 (09) Power-on hours count 86 86 12282 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2413 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 1 1 4436 (BC) Unknown 100 90 622 (BD) vendor-specific 97 97 3 (BE) vendor-specific 64 54 639107108 (C2) HDA temperature 36 46 42949672996 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 45 24 134243007 (C5) Current pending sector count 97 96 135 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 97 96 135 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 1 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 91379724209319 (F1) Unknown 100 253 589258905 (F2) Unknown 100 253 405658615	54.6% Above average	Read 95.3 Write 95 Mixed 86.2 69% 92.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.34 4K Mixed 0.28 77% 0.71 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 54.6% Great: 68%
Seagate Expansion Desk 2TB 7,241 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 246GB free, PID 3312 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	12.5% Very poor	Read 29.7 Write 22.6 Mixed 16.1 27% 22.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.38 4K Write 1.01 4K Mixed 0.23 44% 0.54 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 12.5% Great: 74%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CML16GX3M2A1600C10 Kingston KHX1866C10D3/4GX CML16GX3M2A1600C10 Kingston KHX1866C10D3/4GX 24GB 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 8192, 4096, 8192, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	49.1% Average	MC Read 16.6 MC Write 18 MC Mixed 15.9 48% 16.8 GB/s	SC Read 13.1 SC Write 15.4 SC Mixed 14.6 41% 14.4 GB/s	Latency 69.8 57% 69.8 ns

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Compaq 8200 Elite CMT PC Builds (Compare 1,763 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 57%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq 8200 Elite CMT PC

CPU
Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples	685x
Core i7-2600Intel $194Bench 67%, 185,630 samples	593x
Core i5-2500IntelBench 63%, 82,538 samples	315x

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	423x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	137x
GTX 1050Nvidia $101Bench 26%, 269,381 samples	86x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	55x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	33x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	30x

RAM
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	22x
HMT351U7BFR8C-H9 HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 HMT351U7BFR8C-H9 HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 16GBHynixBench 49%, 20 samples	14x
M378B5773DH0-CH9 2x2GBSamsungBench 45%, 4,605 samples	11x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 58% - Above average

Total price: $278

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16