| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor. |
| Graphics | 4.65% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Very high background CPU (54%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
8 years ago, 8 years ago.
| System | Medionpc MS-7502 (all builds) |
| Motherboard | MICRO-STAR MS-7502 |
| Memory | 0.8 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.7 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20100113 |
| Uptime | 5.9 Days |
| Run Date | Jan 31 '16 at 13:39 |
| Run Duration | 185 Seconds |
| Run User | GBR-User |
| Background CPU | 54% |
PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
38.4%
Below average
|
37% 55 Pts
|
11% 85.9 Pts
|
6% 94.2 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GeForce GT 230
MSI(1462 127C) 512MB
Driver: nvd3dum.dll Ver. 9.18.13.4192
|
4.65%
Terrible
|
4% 5.28 fps
|
5% 6.23 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Hitachi HDT721010SLA360 1TB-$497
759GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ST6O Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
|
39%
Below average
|
58% 75.9 MB/s
|
82% 0.66 MB/s
| |
|
|
22.1%
Poor
|
24% 32.5 MB/s
|
61% 0.44 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM
|
14.8%
Very poor
|
13% 4.57 GB/s
|
12% 4.1 GB/s
|
34% 119 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical MS-7502 Builds (Compare 93 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Medionpc MS-7502
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core2 Quad Q6600Intel $100Bench 42%, 59,658 samples | 29x |
| Core2 Quad Q8200Intel $49Bench 43%, 19,990 samples | 14x |
| Core2 Duo E6750IntelBench 38%, 9,456 samples | 9x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GeForce 9600 GTNvidiaBench 4%, 20,826 samples | 12x |
| GeForce 8600 GTNvidiaBench 2%, 8,099 samples | 10x |
| GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples | 6x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 28% - Poor | Total price: $280 |