| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 18.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 40% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen. |
| System | MSI MS-7693 |
| Motherboard | MSI 970 GAMING (MS-7693) (all builds) |
| Memory | 13.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.8 GHz |
| Display | 1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colores |
| OS | Windows 8.1 |
| BIOS Date | 20151221 |
| Uptime | 8.3 Days |
| Run Date | Feb 03 '18 at 00:47 |
| Run Duration | 182 Seconds |
| Run User | ARG-User |
| Background CPU | 8% |
PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
64.3%
Good
|
59% 93.3 Pts
|
34% 279 Pts
|
22% 355 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD R7 360-$100
CLim: 1000 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 17.4.4
|
18.1%
Very poor
|
17% 25.8 fps
|
20% 23.4 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SanDisk SSD Plus 240GB-$28
168GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z32070RL Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
|
40%
Below average
|
61% 280 MB/s
|
42% 19 MB/s
|
38% 88.7 MB/s
|
|
|
96.6%
Outstanding
|
122% 162 MB/s
|
104% 1.08 MB/s
| |
|
|
68.1%
Good
|
87% 116 MB/s
|
93% 1.03 MB/s
| |
|
|
49.8%
Average
|
62% 82.4 MB/s
|
89% 0.69 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
HyperX Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing below potential (22nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
48.3%
Average
|
49% 17.2 GB/s
|
30% 10.6 GB/s
|
60% 66.8 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical 970 GAMING (MS-7693) Builds (Compare 2,303 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: MSI 970 GAMING (MS-7693)
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 960x |
| FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 412x |
| FX-8320AMD $175Bench 59%, 106,454 samples | 264x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 166x |
| GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 149x |
| GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples | 141x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 62% - Good | Total price: $289 |