Asrock Z370 Extreme4

Performance Results


Gaming 54% Yacht	Desktop 105% UFO	Workstation 48% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 109%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics	42.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	76.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asrock Z370 Extreme4 (all builds)
Memory	13.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20171012
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 12 '18 at 06:04
Run Duration	150 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	18%

Watch Gameplay: 480 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (49^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-8600K-$173 264,837 User benchmarks, average bench 91% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.95 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	109% Outstanding	Memory 97 1-Core 163 2-Core 325 106% 195 Pts	4-Core 650 8-Core 970 101% 810 Pts	64-Core 972 60% 972 Pts
Poor: 79% ↑ This bench: 109% Great: 101%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 480-$75 261,163 User benchmarks, average bench 46% Asus(1043 0501) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1300 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 17.12.2 Performing below potential (34^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	42.9% Average	Lighting 50.4 Reflection 67.6 Parallax 75.2 41% 64.4 fps	MRender 65.8 Gravity 50.8 Splatting 55.1 46% 57.2 fps
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 42.9% Great: 53%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 414GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT03B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 941 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 35 (B1) Unknown 99 99 2 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 68 61 32 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 13 (F1) Unknown 99 99 2573083339	76.5% Very good	Read 383 Write 335 Mixed 327 78% 348 MB/s	4K Read 39.4 4K Write 71.6 4K Mixed 24.6 129% 45.2 MB/s	DQ Read 41.1 DQ Write 77.7 DQ Mixed 80 55% 66.3 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 76.5% Great: 134%
Hitachi HDS5C3030ALA630 3TB-$124 3,178 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 700GB free Firmware: MEAOA580 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 94 94 393231 (02) Throughput performance 135 135 108 (03) Spinup time 126 126 42985914918 (04) Start/Stop count 96 96 18725 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 135 135 31 (09) Power-on hours count 95 95 36395 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 3626 (C0) Power-off retract count 85 85 18821 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 85 85 18821 (C2) HDA temperature 166 166 197569478692 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 1 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 29	31.8% Below average	Read 54.6 Write 56.2 Mixed 54.8 42% 55.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.38 4K Write 0.85 4K Mixed 0.12 45% 0.45 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 31.8% Great: 66%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$65 103,919 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 50GB free Firmware: 01.00A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 115 110 7216 (04) Start/Stop count 82 82 18034 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 31 31 50377 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 3726 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 340 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 49 49 455222 (C2) HDA temperature 113 88 34 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 15 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 17355 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	45% Average	Read 85.9 Write 70.6 Mixed 63.7 55% 73.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.47 4K Write 1.93 4K Mixed 0.29 88% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 45% Great: 57%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance RGB DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB-$171 37,802 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	98% Outstanding	MC Read 38.4 MC Write 37.3 MC Mixed 27.8 99% 34.5 GB/s	SC Read 23.2 SC Write 36.4 SC Mixed 30.5 86% 30 GB/s	Latency 50.1 80% 50.1 ns
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 98% Great: 104%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Z370 Extreme4 Builds (Compare 3,379 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 94%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 96%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 86%

Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asrock Z370 Extreme4 - $250

CPU
Core i7-8700KIntel $186Bench 88%, 746,287 samples	1,695x
Core i5-8600KIntel $173Bench 91%, 264,837 samples	835x
Core i7-8700Intel $200Bench 87%, 349,567 samples	172x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	394x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	335x
RTX 3080Nvidia $910Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	228x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	144x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	124x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	124x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	219x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $37Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	147x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	112x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 84% - Excellent

Total price: $974

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16