HP s5748hk

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics1.19% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (42%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP s5748hk  (all builds)
MotherboardMSI 2A9C
Memory1.4 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20101105
Uptime2.7 Days
Run DateJan 10 '18 at 04:28
Run Duration103 Seconds
Run User HKG-User
Background CPU 42%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3 550-$110
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
46.3% Average
Memory 62.6
1-Core 69.5
2-Core 114
50% 82 Pts
4-Core 174
8-Core 184
24% 179 Pts
64-Core 186
12% 186 Pts
Poor: 36%
This bench: 46.3%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 5450
MSI(1462 2131) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.19% Terrible
Lighting 1.37
Reflection 1.77
Parallax 1.62
1% 1.59 fps
MRender 1.9
Gravity 0.9
Splatting 2
1% 1.6 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.19%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST3750528AS 750GB-$65
16GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HP35 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
36.2% Below average
Read 63.8
Write 62.2
Mixed 63
48% 63 MB/s
4K Read 0.65
4K Write 1.36
4K Mixed 0.43
100% 0.81 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 36.2%
Great: 65%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
CE80CE80 M378B5273CH0-CH9 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
22.5% Poor
MC Read 7.4
MC Write 7.9
MC Mixed 7.6
22% 7.63 GB/s
SC Read 5.9
SC Write 5.4
SC Mixed 6.5
17% 5.93 GB/s
Latency 120
33% 120 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 22.5%
Great: 26%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback