PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 23% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 8GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | HP Compaq 8100 Elite CMT PC (all builds) |
Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 304Bh |
Memory | 5.2 GB free of 8.00391 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit väriä |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20110714 |
Uptime | 1.2 Days |
Run Date | Jan 08 '18 at 14:13 |
Run Duration | 375 Seconds |
Run User | FIN-User |
Background CPU | 33% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5 760-$100
XU1 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
|
69.4%
Good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD Radeon RX 560-B
Sapphire(1DA2 E348) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1226 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 17.7
|
23%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
39.3%
Below average
|
||||
Seagate ST1000LM048-2E7172 1TB
909GB free
Firmware: SDM1 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
|
67.4%
Good
|
|||
46.2%
Average
|
||||
Hitachi HDS721025CLA382 250GB-$20
167GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JP1OA3GH Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
|
54.1%
Above average
|
|||
38.4%
Below average
|
||||
Samsung Flash Drive 64GB
26GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
|
10.1%
Very poor
|
|||
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 8GB
3GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
|
12.1%
Very poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
41%
Average
|
||||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5 650Intel $70Bench 46%, 42,063 samples | 198x |
Core i7 860Intel $339Bench 64%, 51,451 samples | 159x |
Core i7 870Intel $100Bench 66%, 37,228 samples | 99x |
GPU | |
---|---|
HD Graphics (Clarkdale 0.733/0.9 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 20,588 samples | 82x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 53x |
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples | 41x |
SSD | |
---|---|
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples | 33x |
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples | 18x |
840 Pro 128GBSamsung $150Bench 90%, 34,842 samples | 11x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 54% - Above average | Total price: $98 |