Asus B150M-C

Performance Results


Gaming 12% Tree trunk	Desktop 37% Jet ski	Workstation 26% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including moderate gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.5%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	2.02% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	38.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Windows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.

Very high background CPU (60%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).

Motherboard	Asus B150M-C (all builds)
Memory	5.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170207
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 04 '18 at 17:02
Run Duration	130 Seconds
Run User	ARG-User
Background CPU	60%

PC Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Single core	Quad core	Multi core
Intel Pentium G4560-$57 18,837 User benchmarks, average bench 59% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	44.5% Average	SC Int 41.8 SC Float 51.5 SC Mixed 53.8 39% 49 Pts	QC Int 221 QC Float 252 QC Mixed 240 54% 238 Pts	MC Int 262 MC Float 293 MC Mixed 273 41% 276 Pts
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 44.5% Great: 64%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 430 7,218 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Device(0000 0000) 1GB CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 250 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 388.13 Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	2.02% Terrible	Lighting 6.2 Reflection 6 Parallax 5.3 2% 5.83 fps	MRender 5 Gravity 6 Splatting 4.1 2% 5.03 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 2.02% Great: 5%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$36 6,650 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 35GB free Firmware: SBFK71E0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s SYSTEM NCQ 4KALIGNED SSD TRIM S.M.A.R.T Performing below potential (8^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 1 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 4 (94) Unknown 255 255 0 (95) Unknown 255 255 0 (A7) Unknown 100 100 0 (A8) Unknown 100 100 0 (A9) Unknown 100 100 6 (AA) Unknown 100 100 7 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 1 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 255 255 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 2 (C2) HDA temperature 68 64 154620395552 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (DA) Unknown 100 100 0 (E7) Temperature 100 100 100 (E9) Unknown 100 100 65 (F1) Unknown 100 100 71 (F2) Unknown 100 100 7 (F4) Unknown 100 100 0 (F5) Unknown 100 100 1 (F6) Unknown 100 100 2796	38.4% Below average	Read 259 Write 220 Mixed 117 44% 199 MB/s	4K Read 18.8 4K Write 18.1 4K Mixed 3.79 43% 13.5 MB/s	DQ Read 70.4 DQ Write 50.2 DQ Mixed 3.9 18% 41.5 MB/s
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 38.4% Great: 63%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$41 137,526 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 549GB free Firmware: MS2OA750 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s NCQ 7200 RPM 4KALIGNED S.M.A.R.T Performing below expectations (34^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 141 141 72 (03) Spinup time 124 124 12896960697 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 629 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 115 115 34 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 20006 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 428 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 663 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 663 (C2) HDA temperature 187 187 188979413024 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 41	79.3% Very good	Read 133 Write 143 Mixed 131 102% 136 MB/s	4K Read 0.72 4K Write 1.64 4K Mixed 0.2 83% 0.85 MB/s
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 79.3% Great: 103%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Avexir DDR4-2400 CL16 8GB 1x8GB 201 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	38% Below average	MC Read 13.7 MC Write 13.8 MC Mixed 11.9 38% 13.1 GB/s	SC Read 9.5 SC Write 10.8 SC Mixed 10 29% 10.1 GB/s	Latency 83.4 48% 83.4 ns
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 38% Great: 46%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money.

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical B150M-C Builds (Compare 621 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.

Gaming 17%

Surfboard

Desktop 56%

Gunboat

Workstation 33%

Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus B150M-C

CPU
Core i5-6500Intel $195Bench 74%, 56,101 samples	167x
Core i5-6400Intel $176Bench 68%, 39,000 samples	71x
Core i7-6700Intel $304Bench 79%, 60,225 samples	70x

GPU
HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)IntelBench 8%, 59,225 samples	105x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $300Bench 72%, 250,718 samples	68x
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $230Bench 68%, 87,507 samples	59x

SSD
SSDNow UV400 120GBKingston $45Bench 54%, 21,612 samples	56x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $80Bench 94%, 274,376 samples	42x
SSDNow UV400 240GBKingston $81Bench 58%, 28,427 samples	33x

RAM
Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x4GBHyperX $95Bench 70%, 16,396 samples	37x
Ripjaws 4 DDR4 2133 C15 2x4GBG.SKILLBench 68%, 538 samples	36x
Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x8GBHyperX $226Bench 72%, 16,746 samples	21x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 75% - Very good

Total price: $335

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $330	Nvidia GTX 1070 $447	Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $80
Intel Core i7-7700K $290	Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $300	Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $137
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $170	AMD RX 480 $350	Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $158

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $44	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $183	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $70
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $957	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $45
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $36	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $195	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12