pcs MS-1492

Performance Results


Gaming 16% Surfboard	Desktop 75% Battleship	Workstation 14% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	14.9% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	49.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	pcs MS-1492 (all builds)
Motherboard	Micro-Star MS-1492
Memory	12.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140418
Uptime	0.9 Days
Run Date	Jan 03 '18 at 16:02
Run Duration	153 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	21%

PC Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4710MQ-$50 15,557 User benchmarks, average bench 60% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	72.4% Very good	Memory 84.7 1-Core 99.1 2-Core 190 72% 125 Pts	4-Core 332 8-Core 432 49% 382 Pts	64-Core 388 24% 388 Pts
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 72.4% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 850M 13,931 User benchmarks, average bench 14% MSI(1462 10E3) 2GB Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 23.21.13.8871 Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	14.9% Very poor	Lighting 18.6 Reflection 14.2 Parallax 16.8 15% 16.5 fps	MRender 21.3 Gravity 19.3 Splatting 13.8 14% 18.1 fps
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 14.9% Great: 16%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston HyperX 3K 120GB-$100 46,066 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 14GB free (System drive) Firmware: 580ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 95 95 13513248 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 78 78 -99325413667253 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1098 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 105 (B1) Unknown 0 0 94 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 27 43 51542425627 (C2) HDA temperature 27 43 51542425627 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 13513248 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 13513248 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 13513248 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 94 94 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 33651 (EA) Unknown 0 0 20849 (F1) Unknown 0 0 20849 (F2) Unknown 0 0 6993	49.9% Average	Read 464 Write 157 Mixed 237 62% 286 MB/s	4K Read 17.6 4K Write 41.4 4K Mixed 14.3 67% 24.4 MB/s	DQ Read 22.2 DQ Write 56.1 DQ Mixed 8.75 15% 29 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 49.9% Great: 87%
StoreJet Transcend 1TB 14,954 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 672GB free, PID 5106 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	13.5% Very poor	Read 29 Write 20.1 Mixed 21.8 29% 23.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.43 4K Write 1.58 4K Mixed 0.19 62% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 13.5% Great: 45%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 2x8GB 10,168 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	57.7% Above average	MC Read 21 MC Write 21.8 MC Mixed 19 59% 20.6 GB/s	SC Read 13.2 SC Write 13.8 SC Mixed 18.1 43% 15 GB/s	Latency 72.3 55% 72.3 ns
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 57.7% Great: 61%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical MS-1492 Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 52%

Yacht

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

System: pcs MS-1492

CPU
Core i5-4210MIntelBench 51%, 15,981 samples	2x
Core i5-4310MIntelBench 55%, 6,256 samples	1x
Core i5-4340MIntelBench 59%, 507 samples	1x

GPU
HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 258,091 samples	3x
GTX 850MNvidiaBench 14%, 13,931 samples	1x

SSD
840 Evo 120GBSamsung $85Bench 91%, 104,444 samples	1x

RAM
HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 1x8GBKingstonBench 32%, 27 samples	2x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 1x4GBKingstonBench 24%, 265 samples	1x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 2x8GBKingstonBench 55%, 10,168 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 8% - Terrible

Total price: $85

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16