Asus H61M-K

Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 58% Gunboat	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	0.02% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	48% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus H61M-K (all builds)
Memory	1.6 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	Цвета: 1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 8.1
BIOS Date	20140721
Uptime	0.3 Days
Run Date	Jan 03 '18 at 15:06
Run Duration	470 Seconds
Run User	RUS-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing as expected (41^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2300 19,722 User benchmarks, average bench 64% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	61.3% Good	Memory 89.4 1-Core 77.1 2-Core 148 64% 105 Pts	4-Core 196 8-Core 192 26% 194 Pts	64-Core 194 12% 194 Pts
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 61.3% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTS 250 14,881 User benchmarks, average bench 7% Device(0000 0000) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.1 Relative performance (0^th percentile)	0.02% Terrible	Lighting 0.03 Reflection 10.2 Parallax 4.03 0% 4.77 fps
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 0.02% Great: 8%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
OCZ Trion 150 240GB-$196 15,660 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 101GB free (System drive) Firmware: SAFZ12.3 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 4125 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1320 (A7) Unknown 100 100 0 (A8) Unknown 100 100 0 (A9) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 197 197 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 52 (C2) HDA temperature 69 44 240519348255 (F1) Unknown 100 100 182724	48% Average	Read 262 Write 181 Mixed 185 46% 209 MB/s	4K Read 24.5 4K Write 36 4K Mixed 9.47 68% 23.3 MB/s	DQ Read 173 DQ Write 136 DQ Mixed 46 64% 118 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 48% Great: 95%
UFD 2.0 Silicon-Power8G 8GB 1,859 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 5GB free, PID 1000 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	5.8% Terrible	Read 27.3 Write 4.03 Mixed 6.48 12% 12.6 MB/s	4K Read 4.02 4K Write 0.003 4K Mixed 0.005 15% 1.34 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 5.8% Great: 7%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown FLGE85F-B8MH9 Kingston 99U5471-035.A00LF 6GB 1333, 1333 MHz 2048, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	39.2% Below average	MC Read 13 MC Write 12.9 MC Mixed 12.9 37% 12.9 GB/s	SC Read 11.3 SC Write 12 SC Mixed 12 34% 11.8 GB/s	Latency 68.1 59% 68.1 ns

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H61M-K Builds (Compare 2,320 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 58%

Gunboat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H61M-K - $140

CPU
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	332x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	265x
Core i3-3220Intel $79Bench 52%, 71,790 samples	188x

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	441x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	145x
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples	112x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	102x
A400 120GBKingston $32Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	65x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	49x

RAM
1x4GBUnknownBench 28%, 154,807 samples	49x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	48x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	26x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 72% - Very good

Total price: $227

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16