Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7

Performance Results


Gaming 56% Gunboat	Desktop 85% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 56% Gunboat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	60.2% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	79.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7 (all builds)
Memory	27.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20171207
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 02 '18 at 21:50
Run Duration	250 Seconds
Run User	AUT-User
Background CPU	2%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (55^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 1800X-$60 30,050 User benchmarks, average bench 72% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.55 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	82% Excellent	Memory 82.7 1-Core 110 2-Core 219 77% 137 Pts	4-Core 437 8-Core 793 74% 615 Pts	64-Core 1,205 75% 1,205 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 82% Great: 82%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Zotac(19DA 1438) CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 388.71 Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	60.2% Good	Lighting 76.2 Reflection 75.9 Parallax 73.1 62% 75.1 fps	MRender 69 Gravity 69.4 Splatting 68.7 57% 69.1 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 60.2% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 750 EVO 500GB 31,052 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 353GB free Firmware: MAT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 585 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 362 (B1) Unknown 99 99 1 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 73 37 27 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 42 (F1) Unknown 99 99 2007739338	76.3% Very good	Read 488 Write 271 Mixed 277 76% 346 MB/s	4K Read 39.2 4K Write 53.5 4K Mixed 26.2 121% 39.7 MB/s	DQ Read 38 DQ Write 140 DQ Mixed 63.7 56% 80.5 MB/s
Poor: 77% ↑ This bench: 76.3% Great: 123%
Samsung 750 EVO 500GB 31,052 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 343GB free Firmware: MAT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 570 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 377 (B1) Unknown 99 99 1 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 99 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 72 52 28 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 264 (F1) Unknown 99 99 1920755429	77.1% Very good	Read 488 Write 272 Mixed 277 76% 346 MB/s	4K Read 39.9 4K Write 54 4K Mixed 27.2 124% 40.4 MB/s	DQ Read 38.5 DQ Write 137 DQ Mixed 63.1 55% 79.4 MB/s
Poor: 77% ↑ This bench: 77.1% Great: 123%
Samsung 750 EVO 500GB 31,052 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 279GB free (System drive) Firmware: MAT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 562 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 205 (B1) Unknown 99 99 4 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 71 36 29 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 99 99 3 (EB) Unknown 99 99 55 (F1) Unknown 99 99 4648677326	79.5% Very good	Read 489 Write 265 Mixed 273 75% 342 MB/s	4K Read 37.1 4K Write 51.6 4K Mixed 26.9 118% 38.5 MB/s	DQ Read 239 DQ Write 136 DQ Mixed 62.7 80% 146 MB/s
Poor: 77% ↑ This bench: 79.5% Great: 123%
Adata S511 120GB 604 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 111GB free Firmware: 3.3.2 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (31^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 94 94 4101743 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 88 88 25262997646185 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2564 (AB) Unknown 0 0 0 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 47 (B1) Unknown 0 0 1 (B5) Unknown 0 0 0 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 24 41 51542294552 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 4101743 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 4101743 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 4101743 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 4647 (EA) Unknown 0 0 4634 (F1) Unknown 0 0 4634 (F2) Unknown 0 0 13866	62.2% Good	Read 487 Write 106 Mixed 164 54% 252 MB/s	4K Read 27.1 4K Write 76.5 4K Mixed 15.7 102% 39.8 MB/s	DQ Read 174 DQ Write 129 DQ Mixed 43.6 62% 116 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 62.2% Great: 81%
Adata S511 120GB 604 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 111GB free Firmware: 3.3.2 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (35^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 94 94 4047759 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 88 88 -45397804307741 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2581 (AB) Unknown 0 0 0 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 70 (B1) Unknown 0 0 1 (B5) Unknown 0 0 0 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 24 38 51542097944 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 4047759 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 4047759 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 4047759 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 3441 (EA) Unknown 0 0 3822 (F1) Unknown 0 0 3822 (F2) Unknown 0 0 8907	63.3% Good	Read 485 Write 108 Mixed 167 55% 253 MB/s	4K Read 27.8 4K Write 76 4K Mixed 17.7 105% 40.5 MB/s	DQ Read 175 DQ Write 125 DQ Mixed 44.2 62% 114 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 63.3% Great: 81%
Samsung Spinpoint F1 1TB-$100 65,786 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 540GB free Firmware: 1AA01110 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 99 0 (03) Spinup time 82 82 6270 (04) Start/Stop count 91 91 9330 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 1 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 96 96 18875 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 5 (0B) Calibration retry count 96 96 3196 (0C) Power cycle count 96 96 4541 (0D) Soft read error rate 100 99 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 22 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 17 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 74 48 437846042 (C2) HDA temperature 73 45 4749590555 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 237934 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 253 253 0	65.2% Good	Read 96.7 Write 130 Mixed 105 83% 111 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2.44 4K Mixed 0.46 121% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 65.2% Great: 62%
WD Elements 25A3 5TB 1,735 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 2.5TB free, PID 25a3 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	61.5% Good	Read 153 Write 143 Mixed 132 181% 143 MB/s	4K Read 0.73 4K Write 2.58 4K Mixed 0.27 100% 1.19 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 61.5% Great: 66%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GB-$127 87,239 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	107% Outstanding	MC Read 41.3 MC Write 39.6 MC Mixed 36.5 112% 39.1 GB/s	SC Read 25.7 SC Write 39.7 SC Mixed 30.4 91% 31.9 GB/s	Latency 75.7 53% 75.7 ns
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 107% Great: 120%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-AX370-Gaming K7 Builds (Compare 523 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 79%

Battleship

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 77%

Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7 - $229

CPU
Ryzen 7 1800XAMD $60Bench 72%, 30,050 samples	96x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $225Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	69x
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	59x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	67x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	57x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	28x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	22x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 213%, 165,668 samples	20x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	17x

RAM
Flare X DDR4 3200 C14 2x8GBG.SKILL $73Bench 98%, 54,616 samples	20x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $37Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	18x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	11x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $871

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7

Performance Results

Run History

PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7 - $229

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (55^th percentile)