| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 22.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
| Motherboard | Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0 (all builds) |
| Memory | 7.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20140403 |
| Uptime | 5.7 Days |
| Run Date | Dec 31 '17 at 01:26 |
| Run Duration | 199 Seconds |
| Run User | CHE-User |
| Background CPU | 4% |
PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
AMD FX-8120
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
|
65.7%
Good
|
58% 93 Pts
|
39% 326 Pts
|
26% 418 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD HD 7850-$174
Sapphire(174B E221) 2GB
CLim: 1050 MHz, MLim: 1450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 17.12.2
|
22.6%
Poor
|
22% 30.6 fps
|
23% 27.2 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
63.9%
Good
|
84% 112 MB/s
|
104% 0.89 MB/s
| |
|
WD Blue 2.5" 250GB (2009)-$30
164GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
|
||||
|
WD My Passport 0820 2TB
384GB free, PID 0820
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
|
13.4%
Very poor
|
36% 27.8 MB/s
|
44% 0.56 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3 1866 C9 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz clocked @ 667 MHz
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
44.8%
Average
|
45% 15.8 GB/s
|
30% 10.5 GB/s
|
57% 70 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical M5A99X EVO R2.0 Builds (Compare 753 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0 - $300
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 379x |
| FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples | 102x |
| FX-6300AMD $57Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 82x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 44x |
| GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 43x |
| GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples | 29x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 53% - Above average | Total price: $729 |