Asrock H61M-S

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics30.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive44.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock H61M-S  (all builds)
Memory13.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120405
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateDec 20 '17 at 23:10
Run Duration203 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 29%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3570
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
74.4% Very good
Memory 80.7
1-Core 104
2-Core 207
74% 131 Pts
4-Core 392
8-Core 400
53% 396 Pts
64-Core 397
25% 397 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 74.4%
Great: 75%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 270X-$199
Gigabyte(1458 227D) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1100 MHz, MLim: 1400 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 17.7
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
30.6% Below average
Lighting 38.7
Reflection 35
Parallax 47
32% 40.2 fps
MRender 31
Gravity 32.7
Splatting 40
29% 34.6 fps
Poor: 25%
This bench: 30.6%
Great: 29%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95
168GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0CB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
44.3% Average
Read 219
Write 150
Mixed 146
38% 172 MB/s
4K Read 28.3
4K Write 30.3
4K Mixed 17.5
82% 25.4 MB/s
DQ Read 36.6
DQ Write 55.2
DQ Mixed 17.6
21% 36.5 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 44.3%
Great: 118%
Maxtor 7H500F0 500GB-$50
464GB free
Firmware: HA431DN0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
37.7% Below average
Read 63.8
Write 66.9
Mixed 60.3
48% 63.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.57
4K Write 2.64
4K Mixed 0.29
105% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 37.7%
Great: 38%
USB DISK 3.0 32GB
28GB free, PID 5200
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
8.37% Terrible
Read 33.2
Write 10.2
Mixed 14.2
20% 19.2 MB/s
4K Read 5.16
4K Write 0.04
4K Mixed 0.03
22% 1.74 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 8.37%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B1G73QH0-CK0 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1067 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
42.1% Average
MC Read 14.9
MC Write 15.1
MC Mixed 13.8
42% 14.6 GB/s
SC Read 10.9
SC Write 12.1
SC Mixed 11.1
32% 11.4 GB/s
Latency 79.2
50% 79.2 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 42.1%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H61M-S Builds (Compare 160 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock H61M-S

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $335
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback