Fujitsu ESPRIMO Q520

Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 44% Speed boat	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	3.64% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	66% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

System	Fujitsu ESPRIMO Q520 (all builds)
Motherboard	FUJITSU D3223-A1
Memory	9 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160825
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Dec 16 '17 at 14:56
Run Duration	154 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	33%

PC Performing as expected (46^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4570T 7,298 User benchmarks, average bench 58% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)	52.3% Above average	Memory 60.1 1-Core 40.6 2-Core 67.5 37% 56.1 Pts	4-Core 258 8-Core 261 35% 260 Pts	64-Core 263 16% 263 Pts
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 52.3% Great: 66%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)-$15 230,189 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Fijitsu Siemens(1734 11E7) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4549 Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	3.64% Terrible	Lighting 3.9 Reflection 6.65 Parallax 6.22 3% 5.59 fps	MRender 6.14 Gravity 2.33 Splatting 7.48 4% 5.32 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.64% Great: 3%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 136GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 2782 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 1429 (B1) Unknown 98 98 25 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 49 37 51 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 218 (F1) Unknown 99 99 14994156314	66% Good	Read 487 Write 400 Mixed 407 96% 431 MB/s	4K Read 16.5 4K Write 31.4 4K Mixed 13.3 59% 20.4 MB/s	DQ Read 122 DQ Write 80.3 DQ Mixed 9.24 32% 70.7 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 66% Great: 124%
SanDisk Ultra 16GB 4,598 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 8GB free, PID 5590 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	18.5% Very poor	Read 38.5 Write 20.8 Mixed 25.7 34% 28.4 MB/s	4K Read 4.44 4K Write 2.38 4K Mixed 1.5 148% 2.77 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 18.5% Great: 31%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 16KTF1G64HZ-1G6N1 Samsung M471B5173QH0-YK0 12GB 54 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 4096 MB Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	37% Below average	MC Read 13.6 MC Write 13.9 MC Mixed 11.2 37% 12.9 GB/s	SC Read 11.2 SC Write 13.2 SC Mixed 10.7 33% 11.7 GB/s	Latency 127 31% 127 ns
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 37% Great: 50%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical ESPRIMO Q520 Builds (Compare 73 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 55%

Gunboat

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu ESPRIMO Q520

CPU
Core i3-4130TIntel $60Bench 56%, 5,264 samples	15x
Core i5-4590TIntelBench 60%, 6,079 samples	15x
Core i3-4160TIntelBench 58%, 2,374 samples	11x

GPU
HD 4400 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 64,721 samples	35x
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	25x
HD Graphics (G4 Pentium/Celeron 1.05/1.15 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 43,454 samples	7x

SSD
HyperX 3K 120GBKingston $100Bench 74%, 46,066 samples	5x
MZ7LN128HCHP-00000 128GBSamsungBench 74%, 601 samples	3x
MZ7TE128HMGR-00004 128GBSamsungBench 66%, 696 samples	3x

RAM
M471B5173QH0-YK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 48%, 30,873 samples	6x
M471B5173DB0-YK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 47%, 26,681 samples	5x
M471B1G73DB0-YK0 2x8GBSamsungBench 53%, 30,591 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 36% - Below average

Total price: $160

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16