Asus P8H61-M PRO

Performance Results


Gaming 21% Surfboard	Desktop 79% Battleship	Workstation 17% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	22.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	43.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus P8H61-M PRO (all builds)
Memory	5.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20120511
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 08 '17 at 20:53
Run Duration	157 Seconds
Run User	ROU-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2320-$165 38,345 User benchmarks, average bench 64% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	75.1% Very good	Memory 92.1 1-Core 89.4 2-Core 174 71% 118 Pts	4-Core 337 8-Core 338 45% 337 Pts	64-Core 311 19% 311 Pts
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 75.1% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R7 265-$105 8,934 User benchmarks, average bench 20% Sapphire(174B A001) CLim: 925 MHz, MLim: 1400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 17.11.1 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	22.8% Poor	Lighting 27.6 Reflection 29.5 Parallax 35.8 22% 31 fps	MRender 26.4 Gravity 22.1 Splatting 35 24% 27.8 fps
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 22.8% Great: 21%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 240GB-$89 105,079 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 131GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0C3G Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 82 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 24 (64) Unknown 100 100 100160 (65) Unknown 100 100 13936 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 100 100 4 (AF) Unknown 100 100 0 (B0) Unknown 100 100 0 (B1) Unknown 100 100 43 (B2) Unknown 100 100 0 (B4) Unknown 100 100 804 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 33 100 150325166113 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 0 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 100 100 0 (CC) Soft ECC correction 100 100 0 (E7) Temperature 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 100 100 263 (EA) Unknown 100 100 122 (F1) Unknown 100 100 197 (F2) Unknown 100 100 187 (FA) Read error retry rate 100 100 0	43.5% Average	Read 362 Write 198 Mixed 207 56% 256 MB/s	4K Read 20.4 4K Write 21.5 4K Mixed 7.07 51% 16.3 MB/s	DQ Read 21.8 DQ Write 78.6 DQ Mixed 15.5 22% 38.6 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 43.5% Great: 88%
WD Green 1.5TB (2010)-$170 41,439 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 1TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 199 198 5233 (03) Spinup time 181 179 5925 (04) Start/Stop count 90 90 10190 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 89 89 8169 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2410 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 382 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 168 168 98596 (C2) HDA temperature 120 107 30 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 198 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 199 0	25% Poor	Read 44.2 Write 42.7 Mixed 20.4 26% 35.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.52 4K Write 1.62 4K Mixed 0.11 64% 0.75 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 25% Great: 63%
WD Green 500GB (2009)-$23 63,281 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 107GB free Firmware: 01.0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing as expected (54^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 149 146 3541 (04) Start/Stop count 95 95 5451 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 79 79 15440 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 96 96 4718 (C0) Power-off retract count 198 198 2174 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 199 199 3276 (C2) HDA temperature 111 93 32 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 11904 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0	41.7% Average	Read 73.5 Write 71.4 Mixed 59.8 51% 68.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.42 4K Write 1.82 4K Mixed 0.25 79% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 41.7% Great: 54%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown FLFF65F-D8KQ9 8325 FLFF65F-C8KF9 8GB 15 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	51.5% Above average	MC Read 18.4 MC Write 18.6 MC Mixed 15.9 50% 17.6 GB/s	SC Read 14.3 SC Write 14.9 SC Mixed 15.5 43% 14.9 GB/s	Latency 63.9 63% 63.9 ns
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 51.5% Great: 51%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P8H61-M PRO Builds (Compare 276 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Destroyer

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P8H61-M PRO

CPU
Core i7-2600Intel $197Bench 67%, 185,630 samples	30x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	29x
Core i3-2100Intel $49Bench 51%, 63,701 samples	20x

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	33x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	26x
GTX 550-TiNvidia $250Bench 9%, 54,392 samples	10x

SSD
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	15x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	14x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	10x

RAM
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	7x
PSD34G133381 2x4GBPatriotBench 44%, 873 samples	5x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 67% - Good

Total price: $235

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16