| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
| Graphics | 41.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 37.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
| Memory | 12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Very high background CPU (90%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asrock 970 Pro3 R2.0 (all builds) |
| Memory | 0.5 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1280 x 720 - 32 Bit kleuren |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20140605 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Dec 08 '17 at 17:27 |
| Run Duration | 135 Seconds |
| Run User | NLD-User |
| Background CPU | 90% |
PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
56.2%
Above average
|
52% 82.3 Pts
|
30% 249 Pts
|
19% 310 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD R9 290-$399
Asus(1043 0470) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1000 MHz, MLim: 1260 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 17.11.4
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
41.2%
Average
|
35% 63.1 fps
|
52% 62.4 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
145GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
|
37.8%
Below average
|
52% 235 MB/s
|
38% 13.1 MB/s
|
16% 27.6 MB/s
|
|
|
59.3%
Above average
|
58% 79.8 MB/s
|
104% 0.96 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
24.7%
Poor
|
24% 8.47 GB/s
|
12% 4.3 GB/s
|
48% 83.6 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical 970 Pro3 R2.0 Builds (Compare 787 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock 970 Pro3 R2.0 - $18
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 193x |
| FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 191x |
| FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples | 102x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 63x |
| GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 53x |
| RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples | 33x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 88% - Excellent | Total price: $152 |