Asrock Z270M Extreme4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 66%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 55%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.5%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics64.2% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive222% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
Run History
MotherboardAsrock Z270M Extreme4  (all builds)
Memory3.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display4096 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161103
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 02 '17 at 12:22
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 34%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
Intel Core i5-7600K-$210
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
79.5% Very good
SC Int 111
SC Float 120
SC Mixed 114
92% 115 Pts
QC Int 394
QC Float 451
QC Mixed 401
94% 415 Pts
MC Int 413
MC Float 446
MC Mixed 442
65% 434 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 79.5%
Great: 112%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$250
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 388.43
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
64.2% Good
Lighting 188
Reflection 180
Parallax 196
59% 188 fps
MRender 136
Gravity 188
Splatting 154
68% 159 fps
Poor: 66%
This bench: 64.2%
Great: 78%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$88
232GB free
Firmware: EMT03B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
NCQ 4KALIGNED SSD TRIM S.M.A.R.T
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
112% Outstanding
Read 513
Write 412
Mixed 421
100% 449 MB/s
4K Read 42.1
4K Write 86.1
4K Mixed 46
168% 58.1 MB/s
DQ Read 367
DQ Write 274
DQ Mixed 129
148% 257 MB/s
Poor: 69%
This bench: 112%
Great: 116%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$128
191GB free
Firmware: 2B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SYSTEM 4KALIGNED
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
222% Outstanding
Read 2,008
Write 1,161
Mixed 1,179
320% 1,449 MB/s
4K Read 50.2
4K Write 102
4K Mixed 43.6
186% 65.3 MB/s
DQ Read 420
DQ Write 245
DQ Mixed 143
157% 269 MB/s
Poor: 159%
This bench: 222%
Great: 265%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$60
2TB free
Firmware: CC26 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
NCQ 7200 RPM 4KALIGNED S.M.A.R.T
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
97% Outstanding
Read 167
Write 171
Mixed 160
125% 166 MB/s
4K Read 0.76
4K Write 1.84
4K Mixed 0.22
90% 0.94 MB/s
Poor: 76%
This bench: 97%
Great: 110%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
HyperX Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x4GB-$95
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
66.1% Good
MC Read 24.8
MC Write 24.2
MC Mixed 20.9
67% 23.3 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 23.3
SC Mixed 19.8
55% 19.3 GB/s
Latency 68
59% 68 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 66.1%
Great: 82%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical Z270M Extreme4 Builds (Compare 165 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 116%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 76%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asrock Z270M Extreme4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 124% - Outstanding Total price: $408
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-7700K $280Nvidia GTX 1070 $410Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $88
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 $294AMD RX 480 $265Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $112
Intel Core i5-7600K $210Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $250Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $140
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $205SanDisk Extreme 64GB $40
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $1,050SanDisk Extreme 32GB $22
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $60Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $215SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $10
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback