Asus P7H55D-M EVO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics37.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive36.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P7H55D-M EVO  (all builds)
Memory12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100722
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateNov 21 '17 at 17:11
Run Duration240 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 860-$339
LGA1156, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
73.3% Very good
Memory 93.5
1-Core 86
2-Core 162
69% 114 Pts
4-Core 295
8-Core 377
43% 336 Pts
64-Core 376
23% 376 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 73.3%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 770-$279
Gigabyte(1458 3603) 2GB
CLim: 1293 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
37.9% Below average
Lighting 45.7
Reflection 41
Parallax 54.7
37% 47.1 fps
MRender 54.5
Gravity 53.3
Splatting 39.1
39% 49 fps
Poor: 32%
This bench: 37.9%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 750 EVO 500GB
239GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MAT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
36.4% Below average
Read 254
Write 142
Mixed 145
40% 180 MB/s
4K Read 17.4
4K Write 28.4
4K Mixed 10.7
55% 18.9 MB/s
DQ Read 22.8
DQ Write 32.6
DQ Mixed 10.7
13% 22 MB/s
Poor: 77%
This bench: 36.4%
Great: 123%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
18GB free
Firmware: EMT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
49.8% Average
Read 268
Write 214
Mixed 219
52% 234 MB/s
4K Read 19.4
4K Write 45.4
4K Mixed 17.2
76% 27.3 MB/s
DQ Read 26.7
DQ Write 121
DQ Mixed 75.9
58% 74.5 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 49.8%
Great: 124%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$40
409GB free
Firmware: CC25 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
62.2% Good
Read 94
Write 123
Mixed 147
92% 121 MB/s
4K Read 0.53
4K Write 1.46
4K Mixed 0.18
69% 0.72 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 62.2%
Great: 113%
Seagate NAS HDD 4TB-$145
83GB free
Firmware: SC46 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
58.2% Above average
Read 109
Write 94.5
Mixed 103
77% 102 MB/s
4K Read 0.57
4K Write 1.34
4K Mixed 0.13
63% 0.68 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 58.2%
Great: 100%
WD My Book 25EE 8TB
1.5TB free, PID 25ee
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
45.3% Average
Read 115
Write 108
Mixed 111
143% 112 MB/s
4K Read 0.42
4K Write 1.62
4K Mixed 0.37
70% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 45.3%
Great: 98%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
40.9% Average
MC Read 15.8
MC Write 12.8
MC Mixed 12.3
39% 13.6 GB/s
SC Read 11.2
SC Write 9.8
SC Mixed 12.2
32% 11.1 GB/s
Latency 61
66% 61 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 40.9%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P7H55D-M EVO Builds (Compare 85 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P7H55D-M EVO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 55% - Above average Total price: $518
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback